Brown v. Olson, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1058 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Brown v. Olson, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1058 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Ortega (mass, 2018-09-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Ortega
Mass. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gray v. Brady , 592 F.3d 296 , 305-306 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 561 U.S. 1015 , 130 S.Ct. 3478 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2010) (explaining that African-American and Hispanic jurors are not part of same "cognizable group" for Batson purposes). 9 Where a judge has already found a prima facie showing of excluding prospective jurors based on race, gender, or membership in some other protected class, the judge should carefully scrutinize subsequent challenges to the use of peremptory strikes as to another juror in the same protected class. "[W]here a judge abuses his or her discretion by failing to …
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Lopes
Mass. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gray v. Brady , 592 F.3d 296 , 305-306 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 561 U.S. 1015 , 130 S.Ct. 3478 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2010) ("minorities," African-American, and Hispanic jurors are not part of same "cognizable group" for Batson purposes).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Prunty
Mass. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gray v. Brady, 592 F.3d 296, 305-306 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3478 (2010), and cases cited (rejecting defendant’s argument that court should construe African-American and Hispanic jurors as part of the same “cognizable group” for Batson purposes because “we cannot assume that ‘minorities’ constitute the ‘cognizable group’ essential to showing that the prosecutor intentionally discriminated against such a group in his or her use of peremptory challenges”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thorpe v. District of Columbia
D.D.C. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Olson v. Brown, 594 F.3d 577, 582 (7th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3478 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1058 (2010) (“While the ultimate length of confinement does affect the applicability of the ‘inherently transitory’ exception, the essence of the exception is uncertainty about whether a claim will remain alive for any given plaintiff long enough for a district court to certify the class.”) As exceptions to the mootness doctrine apply, the Court concludes that the fact that Dupree and Wilkerson no longer reside in nursing facilities does not render their claims moot. 3 OR…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tracy Brown, Sheriff, Tippecanoe County, Indiana
v.
Jeffrey Mark Olson
No. 09-1316.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 2010.
177 L. Ed. 2d 1058
Published

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 577.