green
Positive treatment
9.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tomorrow Hudson vs Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama
See Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown, & Root Servs., Inc., 572 F.3d 1271, 1293 (11th Cir.2009) (stating issues not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3499 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2010). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Pepper, 570 F.3d 958 (8th Cir.2009), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3499 , — L.Ed.2d - (U.S. June 28, 2010) (No. 09-6822) (certiorari granted on the following questions: “Whether a federal district *899 judge can consider a defendant’s post-sentencing rehabilitation as a permissible factor supporting a sentencing variance under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) after Gall v. United States?
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Deegan
(2×)
See United States v. Pepper, 570 F.3d 958 (8th Cir.2009), cert. granted ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3499 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re KBR, Inc.
See Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., 450 F.Supp.2d 1373, 1380-81 (N.D.Ga.2006), aff'd 572 F.3d 1271 (2009), cert. denied -U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3499 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2010) (No. 09-683) (driving vehicle in a war zone outside scope); Lessin v. Kellogg Brown & Root, No. CIVA.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Buesing
See United States v. Pepper, 570 F.3d 958, 964-65 (8th Cir.2009), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3499 , — L.Ed.2d-, 2010 WL 2555210 (2010) (No. 09-6822).
cited
Cited "see"
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
See — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3499 , — L.Ed.2d - (2010).
cited
Cited "see"
Sompo Japan Insurance Co. of America v. Union Pacific Railroad
See — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3499 , — L.Ed.2d-(2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Union Pacific Railroad Company
v.
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America (two judgments)
v.
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America (two judgments)
No. 09-787.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2010.
177 L. Ed. 2d 1085
Published
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp., 561 U.S. 89, 130 S. Ct. 2433, 177 L. Ed. 2d 424 (2010). Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Same case below, 341 Fed. Appx. 706 (first judgment) and 341 Fed. Appx. 707 (second judgment).