Horace Sapp v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney Gen. of the State of South Carolina, 39 F.3d 1178 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Horace Sapp v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney Gen. of the State of South Carolina, 39 F.3d 1178 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2023–2024 · 2 courts · …a plaintiff may not avoid the csra by cloaking his lawsuit in the guise of an ftca action. ⚠ not in text
46 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sheridan v. Haaland (mdd, 2024-07-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Sheridan v. Haaland
D. Maryland · 2024 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a plaintiff may not avoid the csra by cloaking his lawsuit in the guise of an ftca action.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) McManus v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
E.D. Va. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a plaintiff may not avoid the csra by cloaking his lawsuit in the guise of an ftca action.
discussed Cited "see" Abdelhamid v. Secretary Of The Navy
E.D. Va. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nguyen v. U.S. Dep’t Defense, 39 F.3d 1178 (4th Cir. 1994), 11 identified by defendants are consistent with those that were the focus of the EEO investigation, and they accurately present the most plausible causes of action contained within the myriad facts that plaintiff has alleged in his Complaint.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Buck v. Secretary of Navy, Dept. of Navy
D. Maryland · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Parker v. North Carolina Dept. of Agric., Food & Drug Div., 39 F.3d 1178 (Table), 1994 WL 633474, at *1-2 (4th Cir. Nov. 14, _1994) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Horace Sapp
v.
State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
94-6665.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 14, 1994.
39 F.3d 1178
Unpublished
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1) · E.D. Virginia (1)

39 F.3d 1178

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Horace SAPP, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6665.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 18, 1994.
Decided Nov. 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-2648-3-3AK).

Horace Sapp, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sapp v. South Carolina, No. CA-93-2648-3-3AK (D.S.C. May 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.