Thomas v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 39 F.3d 1185 (8th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Thomas v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 39 F.3d 1185 (8th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edna Thomas, as a Representative of and for and on Behalf of All Persons Employed in Non-Exempt Entry Level Positions by Southwestern Bell
v.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
94-1585.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Nov 10, 1994.
39 F.3d 1185
Unpublished

39 F.3d 1185

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Edna THOMAS, as a representative of and for and on behalf of
all persons employed in non-exempt entry level
positions by Southwestern Bell, Appellant,
v.
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 94-1585.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 26, 1994.
Filed: Nov. 10, 1994.

Before MAGILL, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Edna Thomas brought this employment discrimination action against Southwestern Bell Telephone Company claiming that it had discriminated against her on the basis of race in violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981. Concluding that Thomas had failed to present evidence establishing a discrimination claim under either Title VII or section 1981, or a retaliation claim, the district court[1] granted summary judgment to Southwestern Bell. Thomas appeals. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court's opinion is clearly correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri