green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Zubiena
See id. *49 *489 In exercising its discretion to impose a fine, a "trial court must take into account the nature of the crime, the level of the offense, and the aggravating and mitigating factors, just as it would in setting the length of imprisonment for a defendant." State v. Sanford Video & News, Inc ., 146 N.C.App. 554 , 557, 553 S.E.2d 217 , 218 (2001), disc. review denied , 355 N.C. 221 , 560 S.E.2d 359 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re D.D.F.
See, e.g., State v. Sanford Video & News, Inc., 146 N.C.App. 554 , 560-61, 553 S.E.2d 217 , 221 (2001), disc. rev. denied, 355 N.C. 221 , 560 S.E.2d 359 (2002) (holding that where form AOC-CR-305 provided two blanks for "the judge's signature, one directly underneath the judgment, and the other located at the bottom of the form below the section giving notice of appeal" and the "judge signed the second signature area at the bottom of the form, this was sufficient to constitute signing the judgment and that defendant was not prejudiced thereby").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re DDF
See, e.g., State v. Sanford Video & News, Inc., 146 N.C.App. 554, 560-61 , 553 S.E.2d 217, 221 (2001), disc. rev. denied, 355 N.C. 221 , 560 S.E.2d 359 (2002) (holding that where form AOC-CR-305 provided two blanks for "the judge's signature, one directly underneath the judgment, and the other located at the bottom of the form below the section giving notice of appeal" and the "judge signed the second signature area at the bottom of the form, this was sufficient to constitute signing the judgment and that defendant was not prejudiced thereby").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
SIMUEL
v.
SIMUEL
No. 449P01.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 31, 2002.
Published
Petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 2002.