State v. Speight, 636 S.E.2d 196 (N.C. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Speight, 636 S.E.2d 196 (N.C. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
TIMMY WAYNE SPEIGHT
No. 491PA04.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 17, 2006.
636 S.E.2d 196
Goodson, Timmons.
Published

ORDER

Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court and remanding this cause for further consideration in light of its decision in Washington v. Recuenco, - U.S. - , 126 S. Ct. 2977 (2006), the following order is entered:

The State shall have 20 days from the filing of this order to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the questions of whether there was error in this case pursuant to Washington v. Recuenco and, if so, whether any error can be found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Speight, 359 N.C. 602 (2005). Defendant may file its brief in response within 20 days after service of the State’s brief upon him. Each side will be allowed up to 20 minutes of oral argument.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 17th day of August •2006.

Timmons-Goodson, J.

For the Court