State v. Boyd, 742 S.E.2d 798 (N.C. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Boyd, 742 S.E.2d 798 (N.C. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (53 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Scarboro (ncctapp, 2022-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Scarboro (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Boyd, 366 N.C. 548 , 742 S.E.2d 798 (2013) (reversing per curiam for the reasons STATE V.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Fowler (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Boyd , 222 N.C.App. 160 , 730 S.E.2d 193 (2012) (Stroud, J., dissenting), dissent adopted by 366 N.C. 548 , 742 S.E.2d 798 (2013).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Collington (2×)
N.C. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Boyd, 366 N.C. 548 , 742 S.E.2d 798 (2013) (reversing a decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis of a dissent that concluded that the defendant had failed to establish that the trial court's decision to allow the jury to consider whether the defendant was guilty of second degree kidnaping on the basis of a theory not supported by the evidence did not constitute plain error given the existence of “overwhelming” evidence tending to support other theories of guilt).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Collington (2×)
N.C. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Boyd, 366 N.C. 548 , 742 S.E.2d 798 (2013) (reversing a decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis of a dissent that concluded that the defendant had failed to establish that the trial court's decision to allow the jury to consider whether the defendant was guilty of second degree kidnaping on the basis of a theory not supported by the evidence did not constitute plain error given the existence of “overwhelming” evidence tending to support other theories of guilt).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Barnes (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. ----, ----, 801 S.E.2d 356 , 361 (2017) ; see also State v. Boyd , 366 N.C. 548 , 548, 742 S.E.2d 798 , 799 (2013) ( per curiam ) (changing the rule that previously held that a disjunctive instruction not supported by the evidence on both theories was per se plain error).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gentle (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. ----, ----, 801 S.E.2d 356 , 361 (2017) (citation omitted); see also State v. Boyd , 366 N.C. 548 , 742 S.E.2d 798 (2013) (reversing per curiam for the reasons stated in State v. Boyd , 222 N.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Campbell (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Boyd , 222 N.C.App 160 , 730 S.E.2d 193 (2012), rev'd for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion , 366 N.C. 548 , 742 S.E.2d 798 (2013) (per curiam) (plain error review applies to an unpreserved error concerning a jury instruction for which there was no evidence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
BRYANT LAMONT BOYD
No. 358A12.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 13, 2013.
742 S.E.2d 798
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant. , Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Andrew DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.
Cited by 17 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining issues.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.