Kenneth Franklin Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Jt. Sec. Complex Al Tumminia Peggy Duncan Michael U. Jones R.E. Beauford, Jr., 56 F.3d 61 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Kenneth Franklin Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Jt. Sec. Complex Al Tumminia Peggy Duncan Michael U. Jones R.E. Beauford, Jr., 56 F.3d 61 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Petty v. Freightliner Corp. (ncwd, 2000-11-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Petty v. Freightliner Corp.
W.D.N.C. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Featherstone v. United Parcel Services, Inc., 56 F.3d 61 (table), 1995 WL 318596, *2 (4th Cir.1995) ("The nonmovant must point to specific evidence establishing a triable dispute, and cannot rely upon bare allegations.") (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bernard v. School Bd. of City of Norfolk
E.D. Va. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Huber v. Howard County, 56 F.3d 61 , 1995 WL 325644, *2 (4th Cir. May 24, 1995) (affirming a decision of the District of Maryland to apply Maryland’s three year general statute of limitations to a case involving the IDEA).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth Franklin Henderson
v.
Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex Al Tumminia Peggy Duncan Michael U. Jones R.E. Beauford, Jr.
95-6177.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 25, 1995.
56 F.3d 61
Published

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kenneth Franklin HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALBEMARLE-CHARLOTTESVILLE JOINT SECURITY COMPLEX; Al
Tumminia; Peggy Duncan; Michael U. Jones; R.E.
Beauford, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6177.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Kenneth Franklin Henderson, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.[*] Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex, No. CA-94-974-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel