No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Marriage of BOYLE, and BOYLE, In the Matter of the Marriage of ADAMS, and ADAMS
No. 96181, CA 6848; No. 96311, CA 6888.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jan 24, 1977.
Gay Canaday, Oregon Legal Services, Oregon City, filed the brief for appellants., No appearance for respondents.
Johnson, Schwab, Tanzer.
Published
JOHNSON, J.
Appellants’ petitions for dissolution of marriage included requests to restore their maiden names. The trial court decreed dissolution, but erroneously denied the requests for name change.
ORS 107.105(l)(g) is explicit:
"(1) Whenever the court grants a decree of annulment or dissolution of marriage or of separation, it has power further to decree as follows:
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
"(g) To change the name of either spouse to a name the spouse held before the marriage. The court must decree a change if it is requested(Emphasis supplied.)
Affirmed as modified. No costs.