McHenry v. Florida Bar, 66 F.3d 270 (11th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
McHenry v. Florida Bar, 66 F.3d 270 (11th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an order determining the existence or non-existence of a triable issue of fact -- the sufficiency of the evidence -- is not immediately appealable.”
18 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dolihite v. Maughon (ca11, 1996-01-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Dolihite v. Maughon
11th Cir. · 1996 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
an order determining the existence or non-existence of a triable issue of fact -- the sufficiency of the evidence -- is not immediately appealable.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Mastroianni v. Bowers
11th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
Johnson v. Jones, --- U.S. ----, ----, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 2156 , 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995); Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F.3d 270, 272 (11th Cir.1995).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sandra D. Riley v. Larue T. Camp, Lori Winkler, F.K.A. Lori Webb (2×)
11th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
"Where ... a district court finds that there exists a genuine issue of material fact regarding the conduct claimed to violate clearly established law, there is no 'final decision' and no interlocutory appellate jurisdiction under Mitchell to review the denial." Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F.3d 270, 272 (11th Cir.1995)(per curiam) (citing Johnson at 312-14, 115 S.Ct. at 2156 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cottrell v. Caldwell
11th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
The contrary holdings in Mastroianni v. Bowers, 74 F.3d 236, 238 (11th Cir.1996), and Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F.3d 270, 272 (11th Cir.1995), preceded Behrens and cannot be reconciled with it.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cottrell v. Caldwell
11th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
The contrary holdings in Mastroianni v. Bowers, 74 F.3d 236, 238 (11th Cir. 1996), and Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F.3d 270, 272 (11th Cir. 1995), preceded Behrens and cannot be reconciled with it.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dolihite v. Maughon (2×)
11th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
See also, Mastroianni v. Bowers, --- F.3d ----, 1996 WL 17032 (11th Cir.1996) ("Insofar as appeals from denials of summary judgment relate to "factual disputes' or "insufficiency of evidence' regarding plaintiff's claim, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction."); Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F.3d 270, 272 (11th Cir.1995) ("An order determining the existence or non-existence of a triable issue of fact—the sufficiency of the evidence—is not immediately appealable.").
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Heggs v. Grant
11th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
Thus, at this interlocutory stage, we may not review a district court’s finding “that there exists a genuine issue of material fact regarding the conduct claimed to violate clearly established law.” Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F.3d 270, 272 (11th Cir.1995).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Robert D. Mastroianni v. Michael J. Bowers, Patrick D. Deering, Joe B. Jackson, Jr., Weyland Yeomans
11th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
Johnson v. Jones, — U.S. -, -, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 2156 , 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995); Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F.3d 270, 272 (11th Cir.1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
G. Stewart McHENRY, Went for It, Inc., a Florida Corporation, John T. Blakely, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
THE FLORIDA BAR, Susan v. Bloemendaal, Defendants-Appellants
93-2069.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 22, 1995.
66 F.3d 270
Barry Richard, Tallahassee, FL, for appellants., Paul D. Kamenar, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Washington Legal Foundation, Allied Educational., Bruce S. Rogow, Beverly A. Pohl, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for appellees.
Black, Dyer, Alaimo.
Published

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BLACK, Circuit Judge, DYER, Senior Circuit Judge, and ALAIMO * , Senior District Judge. PER CURIAM:

On June 21, 1995, the Supreme Court reversed this panel’s opinion in McHenry v. Florida Bar, 21 F.3d 1038 (11th Cir.1994). See Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc., — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 2371, 132 L.Ed.2d 541. (1995). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff, McHenry v. Florida Bar, 808 F.Supp. 1543 (M.D.Fla.1992), and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.