David Ray Thomas v. Sammie Brown, Classification Supervisor Matthew Ogunsile Benjamin Montgomery, Warden, 70 F.3d 1263 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
David Ray Thomas v. Sammie Brown, Classification Supervisor Matthew Ogunsile Benjamin Montgomery, Warden, 70 F.3d 1263 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David Ray Thomas
v.
Sammie Brown, Classification Supervisor Matthew Ogunsile Benjamin Montgomery, Warden
95-6614.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Dec 5, 1995.
70 F.3d 1263
Unpublished

70 F.3d 1263

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Ray THOMAS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Sammie BROWN, Classification Supervisor; Matthew Ogunsile;
Benjamin Montgomery, Warden, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6614.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 8, 1995.
Decided Dec. 5, 1995.

David Ray Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Holly, BRAITHWAITE, MCCANTS, HOLLY & SMITH, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.[*] Thomas v. Brown, No. CA-93-836-1-6AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

To the extent that Thomas appeals from the judgment entered November 15, 1994, his appeal is untimely