Truitt A. Segers v. U.S. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 81 F.3d 151 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Truitt A. Segers v. U.S. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 81 F.3d 151 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Harvey v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (txsd, 1997-04-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Harvey v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
S.D. Tex. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meinecke, 66 F.3d at 84 ; see also Nichols, 81 F.3d at 41 (citing Amburgey, 936 F.2d at 812 ); Thornbrough, 760 F.2d at 642 ; Molnar, 986 F.2d at 119 ; Resare v. Raytheon Co., 981 F.2d 32, 41-42 (1st Cir.1992); Rollins v. TechSouth, Inc., 833 F.2d 1525 , 1532 n. 14 (11th Cir.1987); Williams, 656 F.2d at 129 ; see generally Sale v. Philip Morris, USA 81 F.3d 151 , 1996 WL 128415, at *1 (4th Cir. Mar.21, 1996); Mitchell v. Worldwide Underwriters Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Truitt A. Segers
v.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
95-2477.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Mar 21, 1996.
81 F.3d 151
Unpublished

81 F.3d 151

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Truitt A. SEGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-2477.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 3, 1995.
Decided: March 21, 1996.

Truitt A. Segers, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Segers v. United States Dep't of Veterans Affairs, No. CA-94-657-6 (M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.