United States v. John Antonio Evans, 89 F.3d 830 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. John Antonio Evans, 89 F.3d 830 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Groves (ca4, 1999-07-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Groves
4th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Groves, 89 F.3d 830 , 1996 WL 346519 (4th Cir. June 25, 1996) (unpublished).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
John Antonio Evans
95-7524.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 11, 1996.
89 F.3d 830
Unpublished

89 F.3d 830

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John Antonio EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7524.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 1996.
Decided June 11, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-89-183-A, CA-95-504-AM)

John Antonio Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Evans, Nos. CR-89-183-A; CA-95-504-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.