Pamela Jean Watson v. City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Dep't, 89 F.3d 831 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Pamela Jean Watson v. City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Dep't, 89 F.3d 831 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: HARRIS v. TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES (ncmd, 2023-07-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) HARRIS v. TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES
M.D.N.C. · 2023 · confidence medium
“To establish municipal liability under section 1983, the plaintiff must prove the existence of an official policy or custom of the municipality that proximately caused the deprivation of his rights.” Wright v. Town of Glenarden, 89 F.3d 831, at *3 (4th Cir. 1996) (table decision) (citing Spell v. McDaniel, 824 F.2d 1380 , 1385–87 (4th Cir. 1987)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pamela Jean Watson
v.
City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Department
96-6408.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 6, 1996.
89 F.3d 831
Unpublished

89 F.3d 831

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Pamela Jean WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF RALEIGH, Raleigh Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-6408.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 6, 1996.

Pamela Jean Watson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Watson v. City of Raleigh, No. CA-96-65-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED