Richard A. Bryant v. United States Dep't of Just. Bureau of Prisons Kathleen Hawk, Dir., 92 F.3d 1177 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Richard A. Bryant v. United States Dep't of Just. Bureau of Prisons Kathleen Hawk, Dir., 92 F.3d 1177 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard A. Bryant
v.
United States Department of Justice Bureau of Prisons Kathleen Hawk, Director
96-6165.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jul 30, 1996.
92 F.3d 1177
Unpublished

92 F.3d 1177

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard A. BRYANT, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Bureau of Prisons;
Kathleen Hawk, Director, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 96-6165.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided July 30, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-1049-5-H)

Richard A. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bryant v. United States Dep't of Justice, No. CA-95-1049-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.