Anthony Bernard Page v. Lawrence Saunders, 97 F.3d 1448 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Anthony Bernard Page v. Lawrence Saunders, 97 F.3d 1448 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John W. Hancock, Jr., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (ca4, 2003-09-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" John W. Hancock, Jr., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 97 F.3d 1448 (table), 1996 WL 532744 , at *5 (4th Cir.), citing Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. NLRB, 804 F.2d 808, 813-15 (3d Cir.1986); see also Amer.
discussed Cited "see" Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc. v. Alpha Nursery, Inc.
W.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Marriott PLP Corp. v. Tusch-man, 904 F.Supp. 461, 468-69 (D.Md.1995) (declining to grant relief in action seeking declaration that plaintiff had not violated Securities Act of 1933, where, at the time plaintiffs filed suit, they were aware that substantially identical litigation was imminent and that, in all probability, it would be filed in Texas state court), aff'd, 97 F.3d 1448 (4th Cir.1996); 909 Corp. v. Bolingbrook Police Pension Fund, 741 F.Supp. 1290, 1292-93 (S.D.Tex.1990) (dismissing anticipatory declaratory judgment action under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in favor of secon…
discussed Cited "see" Poly-America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
5th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Montgomery Ward & Co. v. NLRB, 97 F.3d 1448 (4th Cir.1996) (unpublished) (rejecting a company's due process argument that it did not receive notice that certain statements were at issue because the complaint provided notice of the acts alleged to be unfair labor practices and the statements "did not call for a different defense than the one mounted by the company”); McKenzie Eng'g Co. v. NLRB, 182 F.3d 622, 626-27 (8th Cir.1999) ("[a] respondent to an agency action ... has been accorded due process if the record shows that it understood the issues and was afforded a full opportunity to m…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony Bernard Page
v.
Lawrence Saunders
96-6586.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 5, 1996.
97 F.3d 1448
Unpublished

97 F.3d 1448

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony Bernard PAGE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Lawrence SAUNDERS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 96-6586.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 22, 1996.
Decided Sept. 5, 1996.

Anthony Bernard Page, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Page v. Saunders, No. CA-96-275-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.