Will Elliot Clark v. Bill Armontrout Donald Cline Phillip Vance, 99 F.3d 1143 (8th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Will Elliot Clark v. Bill Armontrout Donald Cline Phillip Vance, 99 F.3d 1143 (8th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Pelayo Jose Cuervo, Also Known as Jose Cuervo, Also Known as Pelayo Joe Cuervo, Also Known as Anthony Badessa, Also Known as Tattoo Joe, Also Known as Tattoo Badessa, United States of America v. Robert Lee Norman, Also Known as Skunk, United States of America v. Russell J. Schoenauer, United States of America v. Russell J. Schoenauer (ca8, 2004-03-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Pelayo Jose Cuervo, Also Known as Jose Cuervo, Also Known as Pelayo Joe Cuervo, Also Known as Anthony Badessa, Also Known as Tattoo Joe, Also Known as Tattoo Badessa, United States of America v. Robert Lee Norman, Also Known as Skunk, United States of America v. Russell J. Schoenauer, United States of America v. Russell J. Schoenauer
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Casas v. United States, 99 F.3d 1143 (8th Cir. 1996) (unpublished table decision); Autullo v. United States, 81 F.3d 163 (6th Cir. 1996) (unpublished table decision).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Pelayo Jose Cuervo
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Casas v. United States, 99 F.3d 1143 (8th Cir.1996) (unpublished table decision); Autullo v. United States, 81 F.3d 163 (7th Cir.1996) (unpublished table decision).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Will Elliot Clark
v.
Bill Armontrout Donald Cline Phillip Vance
95-2169.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Oct 7, 1996.
99 F.3d 1143
Unpublished

99 F.3d 1143

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Will Elliot CLARK Appellant,
v.
Bill ARMONTROUT; Donald Cline; Phillip Vance, Appellees.

No. 95-2169.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 1996
Filed Oct. 7, 1996

Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, petitioner alleged various violations of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution relating to supposedly unsanitary conditions in the Jefferson City Correctional Center. Petitioner prevailed at his first trial, and the jury awarded him nominal damages of $1.00. We remanded for a new trial in light of Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994). See Clark v. Armontrout, 28 F.3d 71 (8th Cir.1994) (per curiam). At the petitioner's second trial, the jury found for the defendants. The district court[1] denied petitioner's motion for a new trial. In the present appeal, petitioner argues that the trial court committed reversible error regarding several evidentiary points and claims that defense counsel's conduct warrants a new trial.

2

We have read the record carefully and discern no legal error. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri