Furr v. Dir., Virginia Dept. of Corr., 105 F.3d 647 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Furr v. Dir., Virginia Dept. of Corr., 105 F.3d 647 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“since filed her second complaint more than one year after receiving her right to sue letter, that complaint was time-barred.”
35 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: WILLIAMS v. FUTURE FOAM INC. (ncmd, 2025-04-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) WILLIAMS v. FUTURE FOAM INC.
M.D.N.C. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
dismissal of a title vii claim without prejudice does not toll the ninety-day limitations period.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) High v. Wells Fargo Bank
E.D. Va. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
since filed her second complaint more than one year after receiving her right to sue letter, that complaint was time-barred.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Joyce v. Silveri Tile Co.
D.D.C. · 1999 · confidence medium
Baker, 105 F.3d at 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Channing T. Furr
v.
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections Dale A. Gardner, Sheriff Darnley Hodge, Supervisor, Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Adult Detention Center
96-6369.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Dec 31, 1996.
105 F.3d 647

105 F.3d 647

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Channing T. FURR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections; Dale A.
Gardner, Sheriff; Darnley Hodge, Supervisor,
Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Adult
Detention Center, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-6369.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 1996.
Decided Dec. 31, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1098-R)

J. Lloyd Snook, III, SNOOK & HAUGHEY, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia; John Christian Lowe, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant.

Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Furr v. Director, No. CA-94-1098-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED