United States v. Larry Dean Henderson, 105 F.3d 663 (8th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Larry Dean Henderson, 105 F.3d 663 (8th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lee v. Escobar (arwd, 2022-11-09) · Strongest negative: Woods v. Wills (moed, 2005-11-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Woods v. Wills
E.D. Mo. · 2005 · signal: but see · confidence high
June 28, 2005) (refusing to dismiss claim of minor plaintiff for lack of standing where caption of complaint stated it was being brought by the "friend and natural father" of the minor plaintiff; but appointing guardian ad litem where the father was not capable of serving as next friend because he had been charged with endangering the welfare of the child); but see Weber v. United States, 105 F.3d 663 , 1997 WL 1591, *1 (8th Cir.1997) (unpublished per curiam) (magistrate judge did not err in sua sponte dismissing claims of plaintiff's minor children because he failed to file a motion to procee…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lee v. Escobar
W.D. Ark. · 2022 · confidence medium
See Buckley, 997 F.2d at 495 ; see also Dockery v. Houston, 229 F. App’x 428, 428 (8th Cir. 2007) (inmates cannot “sue [under § 1983] for allegedly false statements in a grievance response”); Lomholt v. Holder, 287 F.3d 683, 684 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (the denial of grievances does not establish a substantive constitutional claim); Moore v. Thurber, 105 F.3d 663, 663 (8th Cir. 1997) (unpublished table opinion) (holding that the “district court properly dismissed as frivolous [plaintiff’s] claim that his constitutional rights were violated when [prison officials] failed to adhe…
cited Cited "see" Salpatoria v. Archambeau
D.S.D. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moore v. Thurber, 105 F.3d 663 (8th Cir. 1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Larry Dean Henderson
96-1921.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jan 13, 1997.
105 F.3d 663
Unpublished

105 F.3d 663

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Larry Dean HENDERSON, Appellant.

No. 96-1921WA

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 6, 1997.
Decided Jan. 13, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Larry Dean Henderson appeals his drug-related convictions and sentence. Henderson contends the district court improperly denied his motions for a continuance, for dismissal under the Speedy Trial Act for violation of the thirty-day preparation period, and for dismissal on double jeopardy grounds based on the civil forfeiture of Henderson's property. Having reviewed the record, we conclude the district court's rulings are clearly correct. Also, we have considered the arguments raised in Henderson's pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Thus, we affirm Henderson's convictions and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.