Madden v. United States, 178 L. Ed. 2d 475 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Madden v. United States, 178 L. Ed. 2d 475 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tattoo Art, Inc. v. Tat International, LLC (vaed, 2011-06-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tattoo Art, Inc. v. Tat International, LLC
E.D. Va. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Olan Mills, 23 F.3d at 1349 ; see also, e.g., Cosmetic Ideas, Inc. v. IAC/Interactivecorp, 606 F.3d 612, 619 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 686 , 178 L.Ed.2d 479 (2010) (post-MwAmcfc decision).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stowe v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
E.D.N.Y · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co., 196 F.3d 402, 406 (2d Cir.1999) (citing Rogers and recognizing that FELA requires a relaxed standard of causation); see also McBride v. CSX Transp., Inc., 598 F.3d 388, 399, 403-06 (7th Cir.2010), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 644 , 178 L.Ed.2d 475 (2010) (holding that FELA requires a “relaxed” standard of causation based on Rogers and collecting other drcuit decisions that hold the same). 9 As such, instructing a jury on the traditional proximate cause standard of tort litigation has been found to be clear and reversible error in FELA cases.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Myers v. Illinois Central Railroad
7th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. Sorrell, 549 U.S. 158, 173-175 , 127 S.Ct. 799 , 166 L.Ed.2d 638 & fn* (2007) (Souter, J., concurring) (surveying cases); id. at 178-181 , 127 S.Ct. 799 (Ginsburg, J., concurring) (same); see also McBride v. CSX Transp., Inc., 598 F.3d 388 (7th Cir.2010) (Ripple, J.), cert, granted, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 644 , 178 L.Ed.2d 475 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marcia Lorraine Madden
v.
United States
No. 10-6837.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 2010.
178 L. Ed. 2d 475
Published

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 20, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.