Eva F. Chambers v. Kershaw Cnty. Sch. Dist., 106 F.3d 389 (4th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Eva F. Chambers v. Kershaw Cnty. Sch. Dist., 106 F.3d 389 (4th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pens. Plan Guide P 23931g the Board of Trustees of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 141 Pension Fund (\The Fund\") George P. Stefanow Patrick J. McDermott Richard W. Yahn Edmund J. Yahn Howard Allen
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Pens. Plan Guide P 23931g the Board of Trustees of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 141 Pension Fund (\The Fund\") George P. Stefanow Patrick J. McDermott Richard W. Yahn Edmund J. Yahn Howard Allen (4×)
unknown court · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." JAMES v. RPS HOLDINGS, LLC
M.D.N.C. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co., L.P., 263 F. Supp. 2d 714, 739 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)); see also, e.g., American Heart Disease Prevention Found. v. Hughey, No. 96-1199, 106 F.3d 389 (table), 1997 WL 42714, at *5 (4th Cir. Feb. 4, 1997) (unpublished) (noting that federal court in Virginia, “[a]s a proper and convenient forum,” could grant Section 3 stay despite agreement to arbitrate in New Jersey); Southern Concrete Prods., Inc. v. ARCO Design/Build, Inc., No. 1:11C0V194, 2012 WL 1067906 , at *8 (W.D.N.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." SUNBELT RESIDENTIAL ACQUISITIONS, LLC v. CROWNE LAKE ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
M.D.N.C. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Group, Inc., 269 F. Supp. 2d 356, 363 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (quoting 9 U.S.C. § 3 ) (brackets omitted); see also, e.g., American Heart Disease Prevention Found. v. Hughey, No. 96–1199, 106 F.3d 389 (table), 1997 WL 42714, at *5 (4th Cir. Feb. 4, 1997) (unpublished) (noting that federal court in Virginia, “[a]s a proper and convenient forum,” could grant Section 3 stay despite agreement to arbitrate in New Jersey); Southern Concrete Prods., 2012 WL 1067906 , at *8 (issuing Section 3 stay of declaratory-judgment action brought by party seeking to avoid arbitration in St.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eva F. Chambers
v.
Kershaw County School District
95-2952.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 16, 1997.
106 F.3d 389
Unpublished

106 F.3d 389

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eva F. CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KERSHAW COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-2952.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 9, 1997.
Decided Jan. 16, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-94-1109-3-19BD)

Eva F. Chambers, Appellant Pro Se.

Kenneth Lendren Childs, CHILDS & DUFF, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Geoffrey Ross Bonham, GOODSTEIN & GOODSTEIN, Summerville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Eva F. Chambers appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil rights action. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

2

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

AFFIRMED.