Extreme Networks, Inc. v. Enterasys Networks, Inc., 180 L. Ed. 2d 246 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Extreme Networks, Inc. v. Enterasys Networks, Inc., 180 L. Ed. 2d 246 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Paul Sulak v. State (texapp, 2016-06-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Paul Sulak v. State
Tex. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Eubanks v. State, 326 S.W.3d 231 , 242 & n.3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d) (noting that sexual performance by a child is a conduct-oriented offense and that each victim constitutes an allowable unit of prosecution), cert. denied, 563 U.S. 1033 (2011). 2 and that he did THEN AND THERE INTENTIONALLY OR KNOWINGLY, KNOWING THE CHARACTER AND CONTENT THEREOF, EMPLOY, AUTHORIZE OR INDUCE A CHILD YOUNGER THAN 14 YEARS OF AGE, NAMELY, [TOM] TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL CONDUCT OR A SEXUAL PERFORMANCE, TO-WIT: CONTACTING THE SEXUAL ORGAN OF [LIZ], A CHILD YOUNGER THAN 14 YEARS OF AGE, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Extreme Networks, Inc.
v.
Enterasys Networks, Inc.
No. 10-1199.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 2011.
180 L. Ed. 2d 246
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 709.