green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Deborah A. Brown
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see id. at 1117, 114 S.Ct. 2120 (Thomas, J., joined by Scalia, J., dissenting) (“Indeed, given the Court’s [prior decisions], no principled reason immediately appears for declining to apply Batson to any strike based on a classification that is accorded heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause.”).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Commonwealth v. Carson
But cf. Minnesota v. Davis, 504 N.W.2d 767 (Minn.1993) (refusing to extend Batson to peremptory challenges on the basis of religion), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (Ginsburg, J., concurring; Thomas, J., dissenting, joined by Scalia, J.).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Fuller
Justice Ginsburg observed when the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Davis, supra, that “ ‘religious affiliation is not as self-evident as race or gender,’ ” 511 U.S. at 1115, 114 S.Ct. at 2120, 128 L.Ed.2d at 679 (citation omitted); yet, any person whose religion requires or even encourages certain modes of dress is *200 understood to be affiliated with a specific religion and may be considered by the prosecutor to be demonstrably devout.
discussed
Cited "see"
Christopher Young v. Lorie Davis, Director
See Davis v. Minnesota, 511 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 2120-22, 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (Thomas, J., joined by Scalia, J., dissenting from the denial of certiorari); United States v. Brown, 352 F.3d 654, 669 (2d Cir. 2003); Highler v. State, 854 N.E.2d 823, 829-30 (Ind. 2006); State v. Hodge, 248 Conn. 207 , 726 A.2d 531, 552-53 (1999); State v. Purcell, 199 Ariz. 319 , 18 P.3d 113, 120 (App. 2001), review denied (Oct. 3, 2001); People v. Martin, 64 Cal.App.4th 378 , 75 Cal.Rptr.2d 147, 151 (1998); see also United States v. Stafford, 136 F.3d 1109, 1114 (7th Cir.), modified, 136 F.3d 1115 (7t…
discussed
Cited "see"
Highler v. State
(2×)
See Davis v. Minmesota, 511 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (denying certiorari on this precise issue); see also Williams v. State, 830 N.E.2d 107 , 111 n. 1 (Ind.Ct.App.2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See Davis v. Minnesota, 511 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (denying certiorari on this precise issue).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Dejesus
See Davis v. Minnesota, 511 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (denying certiorari to appeal from Minnesota Supreme Court decision declining to extend Batson to religion); United States v. Clemmons, 892 F.2d 1153 , 1158 n. 6 (3d Cir.1990) (declining to consider claim of religious discrimination in exercise of peremptory strike because issue raised for the first time on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Cash
T.B. (1994) 511 U.S. 127 [ 114 S.Ct. 1419 , 128 L.Ed.2d 89 ]; see Davis v. Minnesota (1994) 511 U.S. 1115 [ 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 ] (dis. opn. of Thomas, J.) [peremptory challenge to African-American juror because juror was a Jehovah’s Witness].) The United States Supreme Court has set out a three-step process that is required when a party claims that an opponent has improperly discriminated in the exercise of peremptory challenges.
discussed
Cited "see"
Card v. United States
(2×)
See Davis v. Minnesota, 511 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (denying certiorari on this precise issue).
cited
Cited "see"
Thorson v. State
See State v. Davis, 504 N.W.2d 767 (Minn.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Casarez v. State
(2×)
Accord State v. Davis, 504 N.W.2d 767 (Minn. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gaitan
(2×)
See State v. Davis, 504 N.W.2d 767 (Minn.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994); United States v. Hinojosa, 958 F.2d 624, 632 (5th Cir.1992); State v. McRae, 494 N.W.2d 252, 257 (Minn.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.
The following states require a recovery of actual damages to support a punitive damage award: See Robertson Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 14 F.3d 373, 381 (8th Cir.1993) (applying Arkansas law), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 677 (1994); Pulliam v. Dreiling, 839 P.2d 521, 524 (Colo.Ct.App. 1992); Post Office v. Portec, Inc., 913 F.2d 802, 808 (10th Cir.1990) (applying Colorado law); Stephenson v. Capano Dev., Inc., 462 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1983); Russell Corp. v. BancBoston Fin.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Randall Cash v. Ron Barnes
See, e.g., Davis v. Minnesota, 511 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (denying certiorari to review state supreme court decision declining to extend Batson to religion); but see J.E.B. v. Alabama, 511 U.S. 127, 146 , 114 S.Ct. 1419 , 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994) (extending Batson protections to gender-based peremptory challenges).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul R. Stafford, Sr., and Robert L. Allison
Compare State v. Davis, 504 N.W.2d 767 (Minn.1993), with People v. Wheeler, 22 Cal.3d 258 , 148 Cal.Rptr. 890 , 583 P.2d 748 (1978), and Davis v. Minnesota, 511 U.S. 1115, 1116 , 114 S.Ct. 2120, 2121 , 128 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (dissent from denial of cert.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carpenter v. Automobile Club Interinsurance Exchange
Under Arkansas law, punitive damages are appropriate when the conduct is “malicious, wanton, in violation of a relationship of trust or confidence, or ... done with a deliberate intent to injure another.” Ray Dodge, Inc. v. Moore, 251 Ark. 1036 , 479 S.W.2d 518, 523 (1972); see also Robertson Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 14 F.3d 373, 377-78 (8th Cir.1993) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 677 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carpenter v. Automobile Club Interinsurance Exchange
Under Arkansas law, punitive damages are appropriate when the conduct is "malicious, wanton, in violation of a relationship of trust or confidence, or ... done with a deliberate intent to injure another." Ray Dodge, Inc. v. Moore, 251 Ark. 1036 , 479 S.W.2d 518, 523 (1972); see also Robertson Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 14 F.3d 373, 377-78 (8th Cir.1993) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 677 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Trend Resources, Inc. v. OXY Usa Inc.
But the plurality in TXO noted that “in Haslip we referred to the ‘financial position’ of the defendant as one factor that could be taken into account in assessing punitive damages.” TXO, — U.S. at -, 113 S.Ct. at 2723 (plurality); see also Robertson Oil Co., Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 14 F.3d 373, 380 (8th Cir.1993) (allowing a jury to consider defendants’ financial worth in deciding whether to award punitive damages is constitutionally permissible), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 677 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Trend Resources, Inc. Harold G. Hamm, Trustee of the Harold G. Hamm Revocable Inter Vivos Trust Gary H. Wright Cindy Wright Jeffrey B. Hume Farrar Oil Company v. Oxy USA Inc., and Williams Natural Gas Company, Continental Trend Resources, Inc. Harold G. Hamm, Trustee of the Harold G. Hamm Revocable Inter Vivos Trust Gary H. Wright Cindy Wright Jeffrey B. Hume Farrar Oil Company v. Oxy USA Inc. And Williams Natural Gas Company
But the plurality in TXO noted that "in Haslip we referred to the 'financial position' of the defendant as one factor that could be taken into account in assessing punitive damages." TXO, --- U.S. at ----, 113 S.Ct. at 2723 (plurality); see also Robertson Oil Co., Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 14 F.3d 373, 380 (8th Cir.1993) (allowing a jury to consider defendants' financial worth in deciding whether to award punitive damages is constitutionally permissible), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2120 , 128 L.Ed.2d 677 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NORTHBROOK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
Bennie EDWARDS, et ux.
v.
Bennie EDWARDS, et ux.
No. 93-1563.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1994.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The motion of Northbrook Property Insurance Company for leave to intervene is denied. The motion of Northbrook Property Insurance Company for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 93-1504, Celotex Corporation v. Edwards, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2099, 128 L.Ed.2d 661, is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.