Nat'l Indem. Co. v. Sadler, 107 F.3d 7 (3rd Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Indem. Co. v. Sadler, 107 F.3d 7 (3rd Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Abrams v. PG&E Corporation (canb, 2025-09-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Abrams v. PG&E Corporation
Bankr. N.D. Cal. · 2025 · confidence medium
As noted above, and 26 below, there are many applicable affirmative defenses asserted 27 by the Debtors that are plain on the face of the Amended 28 Complaint. 1 Res Judicata and Law of the Case 2 The court has already addressed the preclusive effect of 3 plan confirmation supra. The Confirmation Order, and all its 4 components, constitutes a binding final order, “and precludes 5 the raising of issues which could or should have been raised 6 during the pendency of the case.” See Trulis v. Barton, 107 F.3d 7 685, 691 (9th Cir. 1995); Heritage Hotel Ltd.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Indemnity Company
v.
Wilbert Sadler, T/a Sadler Trucking, Maryland Casulaty Insurance Group T/a Maryland Casualty Company, C.G.M., Inc. Wilma Kaiser
96-1213.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jan 8, 1997.
107 F.3d 7
Published

107 F.3d 7

National Indemnity Company
v.
Wilbert Sadler, t/a Sadler Trucking, Maryland Casulaty
Insurance Group t/a Maryland Casualty Company,
C.G.M., Inc. Wilma Kaiser

NO. 96-1213
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Jan 08, 1997

Appeal From: E.D.Pa. , No. 95-cv-07054

1

Vacated.