discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ewell See United States v. Van Wyk, 83 F.Supp.2d *111 515, 519 (D.N.J.2000), aff’d, 262 F.3d 405 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 826 , 122 S.Ct. 66 , 151 L.Ed.2d 33 (2001); Diaz v. Johnson Matthey, Inc., 893 F.Supp. 358, 372 (D.N.J. 1995).

cited Cited "see" Gambello v. Time Warner Communications, Inc. See Gurary v. Winehouse, 235 F.3d 792, 797-98 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 66 , 151 L.Ed.2d 33 (2001); O’Brien v. Alexander, 101 F.3d 1479 , 1480 (2d Cir.1996).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Safe-Strap Co., Inc. v. Koala Corp. He may be sanctioned for a violation of Rule 11(b)(2) where a reasonable attorney *412 would have concluded that the claim construction proposed by the actual attorney in question was frivolous. 2 Id. at 1073-1074. “ ‘An argument constitutes a frivolous legal position if, under an objective standard of reasonableness, it is clear.. .that there is no chance of success and no reasonable argument to extend, modify or reverse the law as it stands.’ ” Morley, 66 F.3d at 25 (quoting Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole-CNCA, New York Branch v. Valcorp, Inc. (2d Cir.1994) 28 F.3d 259, 264 ); s…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Liggett Group, Inc. v. Engle See, e.g., In re Piper Aircraft Corp., 244 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11th Cir.2001) ("A court's application of res judicata presents questions of law reviewed de novo"), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 827 , 122 S.Ct. 66 , 151 L.Ed.2d 33 (2001).