Dale Hoxworth v. Imperial Holly Corp., 107 F.3d 875 (8th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Dale Hoxworth v. Imperial Holly Corp., 107 F.3d 875 (8th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Steve Salvador Ybarra v. Legal Assistance of Dakota County; Sharon Jones; Hon. David Lutz; Hon. Tanya O’Brien; Hon. Dannia L. Edwards; Lydia Clemens; Michelle Cathleen Ybarra; Keith Ellison; and Jeff Timmerman (mnd, 2025-11-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Steve Salvador Ybarra v. Legal Assistance of Dakota County; Sharon Jones; Hon. David Lutz; Hon. Tanya O’Brien; Hon. Dannia L. Edwards; Lydia Clemens; Michelle Cathleen Ybarra; Keith Ellison; and Jeff Timmerman
D. Minnesota · 2025 · confidence medium
P. 12(f) (Dkt. 92) and Notice of Conflict and Motion for Federal Oversight (Dkt. 33) to the extent it seeks relief on these grounds. 11 attorney who defends a civil suit is entitled to absolute immunity.”) (citing Barrett v. United States, 798 F.2d 565 , 572–73 (2d Cir.1986) and Fry v. Melaragno, 939 F.2d 832, 837 (9th Cir .1991)), aff’d, 287 F. App’x 541 (8th Cir. 2008); Murphy v. Morris, 849 F.2d 1101, 1105 (8th Cir. 1988) (“[A] state assistant attorney general’s function as a government advocate entitles him . . . to absolute immunity from suit for damages.”); Duvall v. Elnick…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Brett Maverick Madeker v. State of Illinois and Jack Flash, Inc.
E.D. Mo. · 2025 · confidence medium
City of Little Rock, 107 F.3d 875, at *1 (8th Cir. 1997) (unpublished table decision) (noting the shift of the frivolity standard from section 1915(d) to section 1915(e)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dale Hoxworth
v.
Imperial Holly Corporation
20-2095.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Feb 12, 1997.
107 F.3d 875
Unpublished

107 F.3d 875

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Dale HOXWORTH, Appellant,
v.
IMPERIAL HOLLY CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 96-1713.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Dale Hoxworth appeals the district court's[1] denial of his motion for a new trial after a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant in his diversity action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' submissions on appeal, we conclude that the district court's judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri