No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hill, administrator, &c.
v.
Moore and Watters, ex'r of Clarke
v.
Moore and Watters, ex'r of Clarke
Jul 15, 1809.
Alfred Moore, in support of the demurrer., Gaston, contra.
is a plain proof that it was perceived by the British parliament
By the Court.
We are of opinion, that a posthumous child is entitled under our statutes of distributions to a distributive share; ánd that Mary Paris Moore was entitled to a share of Julius Moore’s estate equally with the brothers and sisters of saicl Julius, who were living at the time of his death and capable of taking.