green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…scope of a search is generally defined by its express object
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Nathaniel I. Osuorji
(2×)
scope of a search is generally defined by its express object
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Ronald Jones
United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1242 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315, 1617, 1620 (1993).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Jenkins
(2×)
Sec. 1B1.3, comment. (n. 1) (1989); United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1244 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, ----, ----, 113 S.Ct. 1315, 1617, 1620 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993); United States v. Hodges, 935 F.2d 766, 774 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, ----, 112 S.Ct. 251 , 317, 116 L.Ed.2d 206 (1991).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Jenkins
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3, comment, (n. 1) (1989); United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1244 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1315, 1617, 1620 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993); United States v. Hodges, 935 F.2d 766, 774 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, -, 112 S.Ct. 251 , 317, 116 L.Ed.2d 206 (1991).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Gregory Strickland
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, No. 91-2029 (6th Cir. Mar. 15, 1993) (Westlaw, CTA6 database); United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1240-41 (6th Cir.1992) ( 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g) (1988) violations), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315, 1617-18, 1620 (1993); United States v. York, No. 91-5755 (6th Cir. Sept. 2, 1992) (Westlaw, CTA6 database), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1332 (1993); accord United States v. Hager, 969 F.2d 883, 890-91 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 437 (1992); United States v. Blackwood, Nos. 88-3113, 88-3114, 88-3115, 88-3117, 88-3118, 88-3119, 88-3210 (D.C.Cir.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kerchum
(2×)
Furthermore, the court stated that the test for probable cause is “whether there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” Id. at 123 (citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).) Finally, the Sixth Circuit explained that “Determinations of probable cause are based on a review of the ‘totality-of-the-circumstanees,’ and involve a practical, common sense review of the facts available to the officer at the time of the search.” Id. (citing Gates, 462 U.S. at 230 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 ; see Un…
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony C. Ramos v. Shirley A. Rogers, Warden
(2×)
See Warner v. United States, 975 F.2d 1207, 1212 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 932 , 113 S.Ct. 1314 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guitterez
(2×)
See Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 655-56 , 99 S.Ct. 1391, 1396-97 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); accord United States v. Gutierrez-Mederos, 965 F.2d 800, 803 (9th Cir.1992) (noting that a traffic violation “in itself provided founded suspicion for a brief investigatory stop.”), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 932 , 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Olayemi Dele Jinadu (95-3833), Moruf Omotola Lawal (95-3900)
(2×)
See United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1243 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 932 , 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993); United States v. Rigsby, 943 F.2d 631, 639-44 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1269 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sergio Ceballes-Gamez
See United States v. Gutierrez-Mederos, 965 F.2d 800, 802 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315 (1993). 5 The district court, however, denied the motion to suppress because it found the search was valid incident to an arrest supported by probable cause.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Manuel Diaz-Villegas
Ledezma, 26 F.3d at 646 ; United States v. Moss, 9 F.3d 543, 552 (6th Cir.1993); see United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1243 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315 and 1617 and 1620 (1993).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Eduardo Javier Perez
(4×)
See United States v. Gutierrez-Mederos, 965 F.2d 800, 803 (9th Cir.1992) (rejecting appellant's contention that primary reason for stop was because his car fit "Narcotics Trafficking Characteristics" profile), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993). 7 In sum, there is no support for Perez's contention that troopers Roll and Owens stopped him because of a desire to search for contraband.
cited
Cited "see"
Rickman v. Dutton
See Warner v. United States, 975 F.2d 1207, 1213 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1314 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theatrice Matthews and Derron MacLin
See United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1239-40 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315 (1993) (corpus delicti requirement met where there was overwhelming evidence that several crimes occurred; additionally, corroborative evidence supported conviction).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Felipe Ramos, Sr.
See United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1244 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 1617 and 1620 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roberto Martinez
(2×)
See United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1235-36 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Gonzalez-Fernandez
See United States v. Gutierrez-Mederos, 965 F.2d 800, 803 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Gilberto Palafox-Martinez
See United States v. Gutierrez-Mederos, 965 F.2d 800, 803 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315 (1993). 5 Here, the two border patrol agents who stopped Palafox-Martinez' vehicle considered the following factors, amongst others, before initiating the stop: (1) a Chevrolet Celebrity with Arizona license plates driven by a male Hispanic with a female passenger drove past a marked border patrol vehicle on Interstate 19, a route from Mexico to Arizona; and (2) after following the suspect vehicle for about seven kilometers, the border patrol agents observed the vehicle make a "very quick exi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Augustine Chikadili Okayfor (92-1706), and Tim Okosi (92-1812)
(2×)
See United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1243-44 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993); United States v. Hodges, 935 F.2d 766, 774 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 251 , 116 L.Ed.2d 206 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Veeradech Amornvattana
United States v. Bernard S., 795 F.2d 749, 751 (9th Cir.1986); see United States v. Gutierrez-Mederos, 965 F.2d 800, 803 (9th Cir.1992) (reviewing for clear error finding that defendant sufficiently understood English to consent to search), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315 (1993). 1 4 Under the clearly erroneous standard, reversal is only appropriate if we have "a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Ramos, 923 F.2d 1346, 1356 (9th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Brown v. Kentucky Parole Board
See, e.g., Warner v. United States, 975 F.2d 1207, 1211, 1213-14 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied 507 U.S. 932 , 113 S.Ct. 1314 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993) (upholding the district court’s grant of habeas corpus to the petitioner pursuant to § 2254, finding that the petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel in state proceedings where his attorney recommended that he accept the State’s plea offer promising concurrent state and federal sentences, léading him to believe that the federal district court would be bound to impose a concurrent sentence, but the federal court instead imposed …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nwachia v. United States
Baker v. United States, 781 F.2d 85, 90 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1017 , 107 S.Ct. 667 , 93 L.Ed.2d 719 (1986) (petitioner unsuccessfully claimed that broken oral promise by Government to stand mute at sentencing as to length of sentence rendered plea involuntary); see also, Warner v. United States, 975 F.2d 1207, 1212-13 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1314 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mario Alonzo Millan
(4×)
Under our "subjective intent" cases, this finding automatically brings the stop within the definition of "pretextual." Id. at 1386 (stop is pretextual if the "primary purpose of the arresting officers" in making stop is to search for evidence of more serious crime) (emphasis supplied); see also United States v. Gutierrez-Mederos, 965 F.2d 800, 802 (9th Cir.1992) (applying same test), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993); Smith, 802 F.2d at 1124 (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oliver v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Gutierrez-Mederos, 965 F.2d 800 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bud Junior Hayes and Bobby Rayfield
See, e.g., United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1238 (6th Cir.1992) (search of house upheld where defendant contacted officer's to set up drug deal and initially suggested that deal occur at house, and where defendant was at large and may have tried to conceal evidence that remained in the house), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1315 (1993); United States v. Davidson, 936 F.2d 856, 859-60 (6th Cir.1991) (prior to issuance of warrant officers observed defendant frequently meet with known drug dealers, observed defendant drive car of a suspected drug trafficker, observed defendant use a pay telephone o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James L. Newman
Generally speaking, "it is not necessary to give specific unanimity instructions unless 1) a count is extremely complex, 2) there is variance between the indictment and the proof at trial, or 3) there is a tangible risk of jury confusion." Sanderson, 966 F.2d at 187 (citing Duncan, 850 F.2d at 1114 ); see also United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1240-41 (6th Cir.1992) (" 'The touchstone has been the presence of a genuine risk that the jury is confused or that a conviction may occur as the result of different jurors concluding that a defendant committed different acts.' " (quoting Duncan, 850…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph W. HERMAN
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
No. 92-6926.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1993.
Cited by 107 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
Denied.