green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Housing Authority of the City of South Bend
(2×)
See Knapp v. Northwestern Univ., 101 F.3d 473, 478 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2454 , 138 L.Ed.2d 212 .
examined
Cited "see"
Gary L. Branham v. John W. Snow, Secretary, United States Department of Treasury/internal Revenue Service
(3×)
See Knapp v. Northwestern Univ., 101 F.3d 473, 482 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2454 , 138 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997). “[A]lthough a disability is not a permissible ground for assuming an inability to function in a particular context, the disability is not thrown out when considering if the person is qualified for the position sought.” Id. (citing Southeastern Cmty. Coll. v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397, 405-06 , 99 S.Ct. 2361 , 60 L.Ed.2d 980 (1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kohn v. AT & T CORP.
(2×)
DeMar, 49 F.Supp.2d at 89 (citing Ryan v. Grae & Rybicki, 135 F.3d 867, 869-70 (2d Cir.1998)); see Knapp v. Northwestern University, 101 F.3d 473, 481 (7th Cir.)(“Not every impairment that affects an individual’s major life activities is a substantially limiting impairment.”), cer t. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2454 , 138 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997). “[T]he impairment must be significant, and not merely trivial.” Reeves v. Johnson Controls World Servs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory C. Mallett v. Wisconsin Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and Judy R. Norman-Nunnery
(2×)
See Knapp v. Northwestern Univ., 101 F.3d 473, 478 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2454 , 138 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard R. Rothman v. Emory University and Richard W. Riley, Secretary of the Department of Education
(2×)
See Knapp v. Northwestern Univ., 101 F.3d 473, 478 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2454 , 138 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997) (No. 96-1622).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
James Dalton v. Subaru-Isuzu Automotive, Inc.
(4×)
See also Knapp v. Northwestern University, 101 F.3d 473, 478-82 (7th Cir.1996) (discussing major life activities within the context of the analogous Rehabilitation Act of 1973), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2454 , 138 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
(2×)
As Microsoft correctly observes, placing reliance on amorphous considerations, requiring the balancing of multiple factors to ascertain whether a party subject to a judicial order is in violation of its terms, is inconsistent with the requirement that a judicial order provide “explicit notice of precisely what conduct is outlawed.” See Schmidt v. Lessard, 414 U.S. 473, 476 , 94 S.Ct. 713, 715 , 38 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see also Gates v. Shinn, 98 F.3d 463, 472 (9th Cir.1996) (vague standard in consent decree not sufficient to support civil contempt motion), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valle v. City of Chicago
(2×)
See Bultemeyer v. Fort Wayne Community Schools, 100 F.3d 1281, 1284 (7th Cir.1996); see also Knapp v. Northwestern University, 101 F.3d 473, 478 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2454 , 138 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997); Byrne v. Board of Educ., 979 F.2d 560, 563 (7th Cir.1992). 2 *563 B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Margee Daigle KING
v.
Cecil FIELDER, et ux.
v.
Cecil FIELDER, et ux.
No. 96-1621.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1997.
Published
Case below, 103 F.3d 17.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.