green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. v. Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLP (In Re Kaiser Group International, Inc.)
See In re Akl, 397 B.R. 546, 554 (Bankr.D.D.C.2008) (citing In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 931 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999)); see also, Seven Fields, 505 F.3d at 260-61 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. City of South Bend (In Re Phillips)
See In re Towers, 162 F.3d 952, 956 (7th Cir.1998) (“[S]tate law-enforcement actions are outside the scope of the stay to begin with.”), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999). *741 The court also finds that the City was acting pursuant to its police or regulatory power and not to protect its status as a creditor.
discussed
Cited "see"
SUTTON WOODWORKING MACH. CO., INC. v. Mereen-Johnson MacH. Co.
See Christo v. Padgett, 223 F.3d 1324, 1331 (11th Cir.2000)(observing that a majority of courts have concluded that an action filed in state court and later removed to federal court is commenced in state court for purposes of Section 1334(c)(2) and would remain capable of timely adjudication upon remand to state court)(eiting Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand (In re Southmark Corp.), 163 F.3d 925, 929 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999); Robinson v. Mich. Consol.
discussed
Cited "see"
Singleton v. Carter
See Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 371 (6th Cir.) (explaining that “Brecht’s [deferential standard] quite precisely captures Congress’s intent as expressed in AEDPA and, therefore, continues to be applicable”), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Warfel v. City of Saratoga (In Re Warfel)
(2×)
See In re Towers, 162 F.3d 952, 954-56 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Broyles v. U.S. Gypsum Co.
See In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 929 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999); Thomas, 259 B.R. at 575 .
examined
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Anderson
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Strickler, 527 U.S. at 282-83, 119 S.Ct. 1936 .
cited
Cited "see"
Valdez v. Kreso, Inc.
See South-mark Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand (In re South-mark Corp.), 163 F.3d 925, 934 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Daniel Wheeler v. Kurt Jones
See Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 357 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Shannon Novack, Deceased, by Its Personal Representative, Susan Turbin, and Susan Turbin v. County of Wood, a Municipal Corporation
(2×)
See Payne v. Churchich, 161 F.3d 1030, 1042 (7th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate S. Novak v. County of Wood
See Payne v. Churchich, 161 F.3d 1030, 1042 (7th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calvin Whitmore v. Mike Kemna, Superintendent Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of the State of Missouri
See Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 371 (6th Cir.) (“We think that when the issue before the federal habeas court is the state court’s finding of harmless error, the test set out by the Supreme Court in Kotteakos and explicitly reiterated in Brecht quite precisely captures Congress’s intent as expressed in AEDPA and, therefore, continues to be applicable.”), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Glen Coe v. Ricky Bell, Warden
See Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 360 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
All Saints Episcopal Church
(2×)
Indeed, a simple review of the State Court Judgment, itself, bears this out, inasmuch as no reference at all is made to either the Debtor or the Debtor’s Vestry therein.93 Instead, it was the composition of the leadership and the control of the Fort Worth Diocese and the Diocesan Corporation and the ownership of Diocesan Trust Property held in trust by the Diocesan Corporation that was at issue in the litigation.94 And while it is true that, in resolving disputed claims of beneficial ownership to certain of the Diocesan Trust Property, the State Court determined that ACNA All Saints constitu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Principal Life Insurance v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In Re Brook Mays Music Co.)
See also Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand (In re Southmark Corp.), 163 F.3d 925, 930 (5th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999) (action based on state created rights, that, had there been no bankruptcy, could have proceeded in state court, was noncore). 4 .There is, of course, also a list of fifteen or so categories of "core” matters found at 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(A)-(0), including broad "catch-all” categories such as “matters concerning the administration of the estate” and "other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. Gundy
See also Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 362 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999), abrogated on other grounds by Harris v. Stovall, 212 F.3d 940 (6th Cir.2000). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Lordi v. Todd Ishee, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 373-74 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mourad v. Farrell (In Re V&M Management, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 931 (5th Cir.1999) (finding jurisdiction over accountant malpractice claims), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Agent Systems, Inc. v. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (In Re Agent Systems, Inc.)
Harley Hotels, Inc. v. Rain’s International, Ltd., 57 B.R. 773, 780 (M.D.Pa.1985); see, also, In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 930 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robertson v. Abramajtys
See also Harris v. Stovall, 212 F.3d 940 (6th Cir.2000) (applying the Williams standard and abrogating the “reasonable jurist” standard set forth in Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999)). *836 In determining whether the state court decision was “contrary to,” or an “unreasonable application of’ federal law, the AEDPA specifically limits the source of law to “clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court.” As explained by the Sixth Circuit, This provision marks a significant chan…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowling v. Parker
See, e.g., Nevers v. Killinger, 990 F.Supp. 844, 849-50 (E.D.Mich.1997), aff 'd 169 F.3d 352 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999). 12 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal Reinsurance Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
See, e.g., Fleet Bank, Nat’l Assoc. v. Burke, 160 F.3d 883, 893 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal Reinsurance Company, Ltd. v. St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Company
See, e.g., Fleet Bank, Nat'l Assoc. v. Burke, 160 F.3d 883, 893 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 144 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Nixon
See also Fleet Bank, National Association v. Burke, 160 F.3d 883, 887-88 (2nd Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brawner-Ahlstrom
v.
Husson
v.
Husson
No. 98-1646.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1999.
527 U.S. 1004
Published
Ct. App. Colo. Certiorari denied.