green
Positive treatment
17.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Robinson
App. 306 , 813 S.E.2d 254, 263 , writ denied, review denied, 371 N.C. 450 , 817 S.E.2d 205 (2018), this Court again applied the “separate- and-distinct-act analysis” from Rambert, and found multiple assaults “based on different conduct.” Id. at 317, 813 S.E.2d at 263 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Coffey
The first-degree kidnapping indictment provided the element of “sexual assault,” while the jury instruction provided “it could find [the] defendant guilty if it found ‘the [victim] was not released by the defendant in a safe place and/or had been sexually assaulted and/or had been seriously injured.’” Id. at 313, 813 S.E.2d at 260 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Prince
App. 306 , 813 S.E.2d 254, 263 , writ denied, review denied, 371 N.C. 450 , 817 S.E.2d 205 (2018), this Court again applied the “separate-and- distinct-act analysis” from Rambert, and found multiple assaults “based on different conduct.” Id. at 317, 813 S.E.2d at 263 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Prince
App. 306 , 813 S.E.2d 254, 263 , writ denied, review denied, 371 N.C. 450 , 817 S.E.2d 205 (2018), this Court again applied the “separate-and- distinct-act analysis” from Rambert, and found multiple assaults “based on different conduct.” Id. at 317, 813 S.E.2d at 263 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Dew
App. 306 , 813 S.E.2d 254, 263 , writ denied, review denied, 371 N.C. 450 , 817 S.E.2d 205 (2018), this Court again applied the “separate- and-distinct-act analysis” from Rambert, and found multiple assaults “based on different conduct.” Id. at 317, 813 S.E.2d at 263 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Dew
App. 306 , 813 S.E.2d 254, 263 , writ denied, review denied, 371 N.C. 450 , 817 S.E.2d 205 (2018), this Court again applied the “separate- and-distinct-act analysis” from Rambert, and found multiple assaults “based on different conduct.” Id. at 317, 813 S.E.2d at 263 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Karen CECCHETTINI
v.
Thomas CECCHETTINI
v.
Thomas CECCHETTINI
No. 50P18.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 14, 2018.
817 S.E.2d 205
R. Hayes Hofler, III, Attorney at Law, for Cecchettini, Thomas., D. Caldwell Barefoot, Jr., Attorney at Law, Mariana G. Russell, Attorney at Law, Tobias S. Hampson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Cecchettini, Karen.
Published
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of February 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018."