green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“the circumstances of lariscey's case, which 1 includes the earlier dismissed rico suit and the claims court decision covering the same 2 operative facts underlying this case, negate any claim that lariscey has been so diligent as to 3 invoke equitable tolling.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brinich-Barnes v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
the circumstances of lariscey's case, which 1 includes the earlier dismissed rico suit and the claims court decision covering the same 2 operative facts underlying this case, negate any claim that lariscey has been so diligent as to 3 invoke equitable tolling.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Miguel Dimarzo, A/K/A Michael Dimarzo, United States of America v. Mario J. Alzate-Yepez
Flores-Rivera, 66 F.3d at 323-24.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chance Clyce v. Nadine Butler
Boone v. Kurtz, 617 F.2d 435, 436 (5th Cir. 1980) (quoting Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins, 310 U.S. 381 , 402–03 (1940)); see also Lariscey v. Smith, 66 F.3d 323 , 1995 WL 535008, at *2 (5th Cir. 1995) (finding privity between government defendants who “were either the same persons or agencies or employees of the federal government” sued for their “civil RICO enterprise” depriving a prisoner of his invention and its revenues).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Waters
v.
Chater
v.
Chater
94-20733.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 21, 1995.
Unpublished
Citer courts: E.D. California (1)
Waters
v.
Chater[*]
NO. 94-20733
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Aug 18, 1995
Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. CA-H-93-0271
1
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2