Venice Hosp. v. Nelson, 445 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). · Go Syfert
Venice Hosp. v. Nelson, 445 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he order does not resolve all matured issues in controversy and is therefore an interlocutory order not reviewable by appeal.”
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Emro Marketing v. Schwier (fladistctapp, 1996-04-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Emro Marketing v. Schwier
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
he order does not resolve all matured issues in controversy and is therefore an interlocutory order not reviewable by appeal.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nape v. Mark V Construction
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
Recently, in Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 693 So.2d 680, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), we said that “[i]n cases wherein a JCC expressly reserves jurisdiction on a fully tried issue that is ripe for adjudication, such reservation renders the order nonfinal and nonap-pealable.” See also Emro Mktg. v. Schwier, 670 So.2d 1141, 1143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(Reservation of jurisdiction to decide whether temporary total disability benefits accrued after the date of the final hearing rendered the order nonfinal and not appeal-able.); Venice Hosp. v. Nelson, 445 So.2d 621, 622 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)(Order…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
VENICE HOSPITAL and All Risk Corporation of Florida
v.
Christine NELSON
No. AS-373.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb 2, 1984.
445 So. 2d 621
Keith A. Mann, of Dickinson, O Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Sarasota, for appellants., Alex Lancaster, Sarasota, for appellee.
Joanos, Shivers, Thompson.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case the employer/carrier seeks review of an order of the deputy commissioner which does not dispose of all matured issues in the case. Although the order awards temporary total disability benefits, it explicitly reserves jurisdiction to determine the average weekly wage. The issue of average weekly wage was ripe for determination. Thus, the order does not resolve all matured issues in controversy and is therefore an interlocutory order not reviewable by appeal. Southern Wine & Spirits, Inc. v. Hernandez, 442 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Sheffield Steel Products v. Tripp, 433 So.2d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Davis v. Hunt, 432 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); La Croix Construction Co. v. Bush, 431 So.2d 712 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 426 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Crown Hotel v. Friedman, 420 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, 417 So.2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), rev. denied, 429 So.2d 6 (Fla. 1983); State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Waters, 416 So.2d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); General Electric Co. v. Hawkins, 413 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed sua sponte. Such dismissal shall not preclude subsequent review upon appeal from a final order.

SHIVERS, JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.