Estes v. Rockinson, 461 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).
Search
Estes v. Rockinson, 461 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984). Book View Copy Cite
Henry ESTES and Cleo Estes, his wife
v.
Frances E. ROCKINSON
No. AZ-178.
District Court of Appeal of Florida.
Dec 17, 1984.
461 So. 2d 989
David A. Barrett and Albert Craig Pen-son of Barrett & Bajoczky, Tallahassee, for appellants., Jeanette M. Andrews and S. William Fuller, Jr. of Fuller & Johnson, Tallahassee, for appellees.
Barfield, Smith, Zehmer.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The judgment on the pleadings entered by the trial court is affirmed. In affirming the judgment, we hold that a dental hygienist, when cleaning teeth, is a provider of health care within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.