Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (2025)
Limitations other than for the recovery of real property.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session Cite as: Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (2025)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
95.11 Limitations other than for the recovery of real property.—Actions other than for recovery of real property shall be commenced as follows:
(1) WITHIN TWENTY YEARS.—An action on a judgment or decree of a court of record in this state.
(2) WITHIN FIVE YEARS.—
(a) An action on a judgment or decree of any court, not of record, of this state or any court of the United States, any other state or territory in the United States, or a foreign country.
(b) A legal or equitable action on a contract, obligation, or liability founded on a written instrument, except for an action to enforce a claim against a payment bond, which shall be governed by the applicable provisions of paragraph (6)(e), s. 255.05(10), s. 337.18(1), or s. 713.23(1)(e), and except for an action for a deficiency judgment governed by paragraph (6)(g).
(c) An action to foreclose a mortgage.
(d) An action alleging a willful violation of s. 448.110.
(e) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), an action for breach of a property insurance contract, with the period running from the date of loss.
(3) WITHIN FOUR YEARS.—
(a) An action relating to the determination of paternity, with the time running from the date the child reaches the age of majority.
(b) An action founded on the design, planning, or construction of an improvement to real property, with the time running from the date the authority having jurisdiction issues a temporary certificate of occupancy, a certificate of occupancy, or a certificate of completion, or the date of abandonment of construction if not completed, whichever date is earliest; except that, when the action involves a latent defect, the time runs from the time the defect is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence. In any event, the action must be commenced within 7 years after the date the authority having jurisdiction issues a temporary certificate of occupancy, a certificate of occupancy, or a certificate of completion, or the date of abandonment of construction if not completed, whichever date is earliest. However, counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims that arise out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out or attempted to be set out in a pleading may be commenced up to 1 year after the pleading to which such claims relate is served, even if such claims would otherwise be time barred. With respect to actions founded on the design, planning, or construction of an improvement to real property, if such construction is performed pursuant to a duly issued building permit and if the authority having jurisdiction has issued a temporary certificate of occupancy, a certificate of occupancy, or a certificate of completion, then as to the construction which is within the scope of such building permit and certificate, the correction of defects to completed work or repair of completed work, whether performed under warranty or otherwise, does not extend the period of time within which an action must be commenced. If a newly constructed single-dwelling residential building is used as a model home, the time begins to run from the date that a deed is recorded first transferring title to another party. Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, if the improvement to real property consists of the design, planning, or construction of multiple buildings, each building must be considered its own improvement for purposes of determining the limitations period set forth in this paragraph.
(c) An action to recover public money or property held by a public officer or employee, or former public officer or employee, and obtained during, or as a result of, his or her public office or employment.
(d) An action for injury to a person founded on the design, manufacture, distribution, or sale of personal property that is not permanently incorporated in an improvement to real property, including fixtures.
(e) An action founded on a statutory liability.
(f) An action for trespass on real property.
(g) An action for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property.
(h) An action to recover specific personal property.
(i) A legal or equitable action founded on fraud.
(j) A legal or equitable action on a contract, obligation, or liability not founded on a written instrument, including an action for the sale and delivery of goods, wares, and merchandise, and on store accounts.
(k) An action to rescind a contract.
(l) An action for money paid to any governmental authority by mistake or inadvertence.
(m) An action for a statutory penalty or forfeiture.
(n) An action for assault, battery, false arrest, malicious prosecution, malicious interference, false imprisonment, or any other intentional tort, except as provided in subsections (5), (6), and (8).
(o) Any action not specifically provided for in these statutes.
(p) An action alleging a violation, other than a willful violation, of s. 448.110.
(4) WITHIN THREE YEARS.—An action to collect medical debt for services rendered by a facility licensed under chapter 395, provided that the period of limitations shall run from the date on which the facility refers the medical debt to a third party for collection.
(5) WITHIN TWO YEARS.—
(a) An action founded on negligence.
(b) An action for professional malpractice, other than medical malpractice, whether founded on contract or tort; provided that the period of limitations shall run from the time the cause of action is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence. However, the limitation of actions herein for professional malpractice shall be limited to persons in privity with the professional.
(c) An action for medical malpractice shall be commenced within 2 years from the time the incident giving rise to the action occurred or within 2 years from the time the incident is discovered, or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence; however, in no event shall the action be commenced later than 4 years from the date of the incident or occurrence out of which the cause of action accrued, except that this 4-year period shall not bar an action brought on behalf of a minor on or before the child’s eighth birthday. An “action for medical malpractice” is defined as a claim in tort or in contract for damages because of the death, injury, or monetary loss to any person arising out of any medical, dental, or surgical diagnosis, treatment, or care by any provider of health care. The limitation of actions within this subsection shall be limited to the health care provider and persons in privity with the provider of health care. In those actions covered by this paragraph in which it can be shown that fraud, concealment, or intentional misrepresentation of fact prevented the discovery of the injury the period of limitations is extended forward 2 years from the time that the injury is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence, but in no event to exceed 7 years from the date the incident giving rise to the injury occurred, except that this 7-year period shall not bar an action brought on behalf of a minor on or before the child’s eighth birthday. This paragraph shall not apply to actions for which ss. 766.301-766.316 provide the exclusive remedy.
(d) An action to recover wages or overtime or damages or penalties concerning payment of wages and overtime.
(e) An action for wrongful death.
(f) An action founded upon a violation of any provision of chapter 517, with the period running from the time the facts giving rise to the cause of action were discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence, but not more than 5 years from the date such violation occurred.
(g) An action for personal injury caused by contact with or exposure to phenoxy herbicides while serving either as a civilian or as a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during the period January 1, 1962, through May 7, 1975; the period of limitations shall run from the time the cause of action is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.
(h) An action for libel or slander.
(6) WITHIN ONE YEAR.—
(a) An action for specific performance of a contract.
(b) An action to enforce an equitable lien arising from the furnishing of labor, services, or material for the improvement of real property.
(c) An action to enforce rights under the Uniform Commercial Code—Letters of Credit, chapter 675.
(d) An action against any guaranty association and its insured, with the period running from the date of the deadline for filing claims in the order of liquidation.
(e) Except for actions governed by s. 255.05(10), s. 337.18(1), or s. 713.23(1)(e), an action to enforce any claim against a payment bond on which the principal is a contractor, subcontractor, or sub-subcontractor as defined in s. 713.01, for private work as well as public work, from the last furnishing of labor, services, or materials or from the last furnishing of labor, services, or materials by the contractor if the contractor is the principal on a bond on the same construction project, whichever is later.
(f) Except for actions described in subsection (9), or a petition challenging a criminal conviction, all petitions; extraordinary writs; tort actions, including those under s. 768.28(14); or other actions which concern any condition of confinement of a prisoner filed by or on behalf of a prisoner as defined in s. 57.085. Any petition, writ, or action brought under this paragraph must be commenced within 1 year after the time the incident, conduct, or conditions occurred or within 1 year after the time the incident, conduct, or conditions were discovered, or should have been discovered.
(g) An action to enforce a claim of a deficiency related to a note secured by a mortgage against a residential property that is a one-family to four-family dwelling unit. The limitations period shall commence on the day after the certificate is issued by the clerk of court or the day after the mortgagee accepts a deed in lieu of foreclosure.
(7) LACHES.—Laches shall bar any action unless it is commenced within the time provided for legal actions concerning the same subject matter regardless of lack of knowledge by the person sought to be held liable that the person alleging liability would assert his or her rights and whether the person sought to be held liable is injured or prejudiced by the delay. This subsection shall not affect application of laches at an earlier time in accordance with law.
(8) FOR INTENTIONAL TORTS BASED ON ABUSE.—An action founded on alleged abuse, as defined in s. 39.01 or s. 415.102; incest, as defined in s. 826.04; or an action brought pursuant to s. 787.061 may be commenced at any time within 7 years after the age of majority, or within 4 years after the injured person leaves the dependency of the abuser, or within 4 years from the time of discovery by the injured party of both the injury and the causal relationship between the injury and the abuse, whichever occurs later.
(9) WITHIN 30 DAYS FOR ACTIONS CHALLENGING CORRECTIONAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.—Any court action challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Department of Corrections pursuant to s. 944.28(2) must be commenced within 30 days after final disposition of the prisoner disciplinary proceedings through the administrative grievance process under chapter 33, Florida Administrative Code. Any action challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings shall be barred by the court unless it is commenced within the time period provided by this section.
(10) SPECIFIED OFFENSES ON VICTIMS UNDER AGE 16.—An action related to an act constituting a violation of s. 794.011 or an action brought pursuant to s. 787.061 involving a victim who was under the age of 16 at the time of the act may be commenced at any time. This subsection applies to any such action other than one which would have been time barred on or before July 1, 2010.
(11) FOR INTENTIONAL TORTS RESULTING IN DEATH FROM ACTS DESCRIBED IN S. 782.04 OR S. 782.07.—Notwithstanding paragraph (5)(e), an action for wrongful death seeking damages authorized under s. 768.21 brought against a natural person for an intentional tort resulting in death from acts described in s. 782.04 or s. 782.07 may be commenced at any time. This subsection shall not be construed to require an arrest, the filing of formal criminal charges, or a conviction for a violation of s. 782.04 or s. 782.07 as a condition for filing a civil action.
(12) COURT COSTS AND FINES.—Notwithstanding subsection (1), an action to collect court costs, fees, or fines owed to the state may be commenced at any time.
(13) FOR ACTIONS INVOLVING SERVICEMEMBERS.—Any action involving a servicemember as defined in s. 250.01, in which the servicemember is a party, is subject to s. 250.5201 and part IV of chapter 250, which includes the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. ss. 501 et seq., providing for protections to members of the United States Armed Forces, the United States Reserve Forces, or the National Guard during terms of federal or state active duty which materially affect the servicemember’s ability to appear.
History.—s. 10, ch. 1869, 1872; s. 1, ch. 3900, 1889; RS 1294; GS 1725; s. 10, ch. 7838, 1919; RGS 2939; CGL 4663; s. 1, ch. 21892, 1943; s. 7, ch. 24337, 1947; s. 24, ch. 57-1; s. 1, ch. 59-188; s. 1, ch. 67-284; s. 1, ch. 71-254; s. 30, ch. 73-333; s. 7, ch. 74-382; s. 7, ch. 75-9; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 11, ch. 78-435; s. 1, ch. 80-322; s. 34, ch. 83-38; s. 1, ch. 84-13; s. 1, ch. 85-63; s. 139, ch. 86-220; s. 1, ch. 86-231; s. 1, ch. 86-272; s. 1, ch. 88-397; s. 20, ch. 90-109; s. 1, ch. 92-102; s. 520, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 95-283; s. 4, ch. 96-106; s. 1, ch. 96-167; s. 15, ch. 98-280; s. 2, ch. 99-5; s. 12, ch. 99-137; s. 2, ch. 2001-211; s. 15, ch. 2005-230; s. 1, ch. 2005-353; s. 1, ch. 2006-145; s. 2, ch. 2010-45; s. 1, ch. 2010-54; s. 1, ch. 2011-39; s. 13, ch. 2012-100; s. 1, ch. 2012-211; s. 1, ch. 2013-137; s. 18, ch. 2016-24; s. 18, ch. 2017-37; s. 1, ch. 2017-101; s. 10, ch. 2017-107; ss. 1, 2, ch. 2018-97; s. 3, ch. 2023-15; s. 1, ch. 2023-22; s. 1, ch. 2023-86; s. 1, ch. 2024-183; s. 2, ch. 2025-81; s. 41, ch. 2025-153.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2,215
cases (302 in the last 5 years), 1943–2026 · leading case: Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Industries, Inc.
Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Industries, Inc. (2009)
“§ 95.11, Fla. Stat. (2002) (emphasis added).”
Eric Green v. Calvin Cottrell (2016)
“We note that section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, which was enacted under the same chapter law as section 95.”
Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. Sirmons (1979)
“In that case, the court was considering section 95.11(10), Florida Statutes (1969), the predecessor to section 95.”
Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. (2003)
“The pre-1996 version of the statute provides: An action for medical malpractice shall be commenced within 2 years from the time the incident giving rise to the action occurred or within 2 years from the time the incident is discovered, or should have been discovered with the…”
Burshan v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. (2001)
“The statute of limitations at section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2000), is also a matter of "practice and procedure" that the federal court must apply.”
John Patrick v. Richard Hess (2017)
“Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2012), provides the following statute of limitations: Actions other than for recovery of real property shall be commenced as follows: (1) WITHIN TWENTY YEARS.”
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. Beauvais (2016)
“See § 95.11 2)(c), Fla. Stat_ The bank appeals.”
D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc. (2018)
“§ 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that causes of action “founded on negligence” must commence within four years).”
WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi state v. Von Daniel Grant Jr., and Lisa D. Grant (2017)
“§ 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). The trial court agreed with the Grants and held that the one-year statute of limitations barred Whitney Bank’s cause of action.”
Homemakers, Inc. v. Gonzales (1981)
“Acknowledging the intervening amendment to section 95.11, the Court stated: [I]n the absence of any express, clear or manifest legislative intent to apply Section 95.”
Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Associates, LLLP (2014)
“Dismissal Based on Statute of Limitations The limitations periods applicable here are set forth in section 95.11, Florida Statutes, and discussed below.”
Houck Corp. v. New River, Ltd., Pasco (2005)
“051, Florida Statutes (2002), sets forth the times when the limitations period under section 95.11 is tolled, but expressly excludes section 95.”
— 95.11(1) — 38 cases
John Patrick v. Richard Hess (2017)
“Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2012), provides the following statute of limitations: Actions other than for recovery of real property shall be commenced as follows: (1) WITHIN TWENTY YEARS.”
Desert Palace, Inc. v. Wiley (2014)
— 95.11(10) — 5 cases
Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. Sirmons (1979)
“In that case, the court was considering section 95.11(10), Florida Statutes (1969), the predecessor to section 95.”
Glass v. Camara (1979)
Haegele v. Judd (2020)
— 95.11(11) — 1 case
— 95.11(2) — 30 cases
Burshan v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. (2001)
“The statute of limitations at section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2000), is also a matter of "practice and procedure" that the federal court must apply.”
In Re Estate of Tensfeldt (2003)
Toledo Park Homes v. Grant (1984)
— 95.11(2)(a) — 30 cases
Burshan v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. (2001)
“The statute of limitations at section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2000), is also a matter of "practice and procedure" that the federal court must apply.”
John Patrick v. Richard Hess (2017)
“Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2012), provides the following statute of limitations: Actions other than for recovery of real property shall be commenced as follows: (1) WITHIN TWENTY YEARS.”
Kiesel v. Graham (1980)
— 95.11(2)(b) — 206 cases
Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Associates, LLLP (2014)
“Dismissal Based on Statute of Limitations The limitations periods applicable here are set forth in section 95.11, Florida Statutes, and discussed below.”
WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi state v. Von Daniel Grant Jr., and Lisa D. Grant (2017)
“§ 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). The trial court agreed with the Grants and held that the one-year statute of limitations barred Whitney Bank’s cause of action.”
— 95.11(2)(c) — 75 cases
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. Beauvais (2016)
“See § 95.11 2)(c), Fla. Stat_ The bank appeals.”
Houck Corp. v. New River, Ltd., Pasco (2005)
“051, Florida Statutes (2002), sets forth the times when the limitations period under section 95.11 is tolled, but expressly excludes section 95.”
— 95.11(2)(d) — 2 cases
— 95.11(2)(e) — 14 cases
— 95.11(3) — 192 cases
Liggett Group, Inc. v. Engle (2003)
Dade County v. Lambert (1976)
Boyce v. Cluett (1996)
— 95.11(3)(0) — 1 case
Efron v. Milton (2004)
— 95.11(3)(C) — 1 case
Lugo v. Ford Motor Co. (1985)
— 95.11(3)(a) — 148 cases
D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc. (2018)
“§ 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that causes of action “founded on negligence” must commence within four years).”
Carter v. Cross (1979)
— 95.11(3)(b) — 21 cases
Wilson v. Scruggs (1996)
Rose v. Sonson (2016)
Garris v. Cruce (1981)
Fowhand v. Piper (1992)
— 95.11(3)(c) — 103 cases
Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. Sirmons (1979)
“In that case, the court was considering section 95.11(10), Florida Statutes (1969), the predecessor to section 95.”
— 95.11(3)(e) — 17 cases
Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc. (1984)
— 95.11(3)(f) — 70 cases
Ross v. Jim Adams Ford, Inc. (2004)
— 95.11(3)(g) — 5 cases
Suarez v. City of Tampa (2008)
Kitzinger v. Gulf Power Co. (1983)
— 95.11(3)(h) — 5 cases
— 95.11(3)(i) — 11 cases
Velzy v. Estate of Miller (1987)
Jones v. Sun Bank/Miami, NA (1992)
Adams v. State (2019)
Adams v. State (2019)
— 95.11(3)(j) — 52 cases
Tyson v. Viacom, Inc. (2005)
Faw v. Wiles (In Re Wiles) (1994)
— 95.11(3)(k) — 61 cases
Leon Kopel v. Bernardo Kopel (2017)
Banks v. Lardin (2006)
Fowhand v. Piper (1992)
— 95.11(3)(m) — 2 cases
— 95.11(3)(n) — 10 cases
Town of Oakland v. Mercer (2003)
Sawyer v. Gable (1981)
— 95.11(3)(o) — 40 cases
Marek v. State (2009)
Smith v. IMG Worldwide, Inc. (2006)
— 95.11(3)(p) — 78 cases
Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Associates, LLLP (2014)
“Dismissal Based on Statute of Limitations The limitations periods applicable here are set forth in section 95.11, Florida Statutes, and discussed below.”
Collins v. Monroe County (2008)
— 95.11(4) — 104 cases
Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. Sirmons (1979)
“In that case, the court was considering section 95.11(10), Florida Statutes (1969), the predecessor to section 95.”
Moore v. Morris (1985)
Foley v. Morris (1976)
Glass v. Camara (1979)
— 95.11(4)(a) — 122 cases
Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Industries, Inc. (2009)
“§ 95.11, Fla. Stat. (2002) (emphasis added).”
Homemakers, Inc. v. Gonzales (1981)
“Acknowledging the intervening amendment to section 95.11, the Court stated: [I]n the absence of any express, clear or manifest legislative intent to apply Section 95.”
— 95.11(4)(b) — 259 cases
Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. (2003)
“The pre-1996 version of the statute provides: An action for medical malpractice shall be commenced within 2 years from the time the incident giving rise to the action occurred or within 2 years from the time the incident is discovered, or should have been discovered with the…”
Kush v. Lloyd (1992)
Todd v. Johnson (2007)
— 95.11(4)(c) — 42 cases
McRae v. Douglas (1994)
— 95.11(4)(d) — 51 cases
Marek v. State (2009)
— 95.11(4)(e) — 21 cases
Wilder v. Meyer (1991)
— 95.11(4)(f) — 1 case
Zalazar v. Capital Force LLC (2023)
— 95.11(4)(g) — 21 cases
Weeks v. Town of Palm Beach (2018)
— 95.11(4)(h) — 2 cases
Block v. Matesic (2023)
Block v. Matesic (2023)
— 95.11(5) — 64 cases
Nicarry v. Eslinger (2008)
Matthews v. Matthews (1969)
— 95.11(5)(a) — 27 cases
Fox v. Madsen (2009)
— 95.11(5)(b) — 6 cases
Haney v. Holmes (1978)
— 95.11(5)(c) — 4 cases
Vilord v. Jenkins (1969)
— 95.11(5)(d) — 17 cases
McGlynn v. Rosen (1980)
— 95.11(5)(e) — 6 cases
Birnholz v. Steisel (1981)
Cowan v. Turchin (1972)
— 95.11(5)(f) — 23 cases
Eric Green v. Calvin Cottrell (2016)
“We note that section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, which was enacted under the same chapter law as section 95.”
Head v. McNeil (2008)
— 95.11(5)(g) — 8 cases
Eric Green v. Calvin Cottrell (2016)
“We note that section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, which was enacted under the same chapter law as section 95.”
Green v. Cottrell (2015)
Nicarry v. Eslinger (2008)
Calhoun v. Nienhuis (2013)
— 95.11(5)(h) — 8 cases
WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi state v. Von Daniel Grant Jr., and Lisa D. Grant (2017)
“§ 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). The trial court agreed with the Grants and held that the one-year statute of limitations barred Whitney Bank’s cause of action.”
Bush v. Whitney Bank (2017)
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Beckett (2016)
— 95.11(6) — 87 cases
Homemakers, Inc. v. Gonzales (1981)
“Acknowledging the intervening amendment to section 95.11, the Court stated: [I]n the absence of any express, clear or manifest legislative intent to apply Section 95.”
Foley v. Morris (1976)
— 95.11(6)(d) — 1 case
Condominium Association of Golf Villas II, Inc. v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. (2025)
— 95.11(7) — 29 cases
Hearndon v. Graham (2000)
Rodriguez v. Favalora (2009)
Davis v. Monahan (2002)
— 95.11(7)(b) — 14 cases
Azaroglu v. Jordan (1972)
Otis Elevator Co. v. Scott (1987)
— 95.11(7Xb) — 1 case
McGhee v. Ogburn (1983)
— 95.11(8) — 36 cases
Van Meter v. Singletary (1996)
Crews v. Malara (2013)
Allen v. Butterworth (2000)
Kalway v. Singletary (1998)
Singletary v. Van Meter (1998)
— 95.11(9) — 13 cases
D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc. (2018)
“§ 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that causes of action “founded on negligence” must commence within four years).”
Walker v. Walker (1971)
R.R. v. New Life (2018)
— 95.11(I)(a) — 1 case
Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Industries, Inc. (2009)
“§ 95.11, Fla. Stat. (2002) (emphasis added).”
— 95.11(S)(c) — 1 case
— 95.11(S)(k) — 1 case
Leon Kopel v. Bernardo Kopel (2017)
— 95.11(a) — 1 case
De Vane v. United States (1966)
— 95.11(a)(2) — 1 case
In Re Conrad (2000)
— 95.11(a)(3) — 1 case
— 95.11(a)(4) — 1 case
— 95.11(a)(4)(a) — 1 case
— 95.11(c)(3) — 1 case
— 95.11(g) — 1 case
Nicarry v. Eslinger (2008)
— 95.11(h)(5) — 1 case
— 95.11(j) — 1 case
— 95.11(o) — 1 case
— 95.11(p) — 1 case
Anderson v. State (2012)
— 95.11(w)(a) — 1 case
In Re Conrad (2000)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.