United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 169 F.3d 594 (9th Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 169 F.3d 594 (9th Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Branche v. Airtran Airways, Inc. (ca11, 2003-08-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Branche v. Airtran Airways, Inc.
11th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See 169 F.3d at 594-95 . 7 .
discussed Cited "see" King Jewelry, Inc. v. Federal Express Corporation
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 160 F.3d 1259, 1261 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc) (concluding that the Act preempts state laws relating to things like the prices of services), as amended by 169 F.3d 594 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc). 9 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vitek v. Freightquote.com, Inc.
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 160 F.3d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir. 1998), opinion amended on denial of reh’g, 169 F.3d 594 (9th Cir. 1999) (Congress did not intend the ADA “to immunize the airlines from liability for personal injuries caused by their tortious conduct”); Hodges v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 44 F.3d 334 (5th Cir. 1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
594.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 23, 1999.
169 F.3d 594
Unpublished

169 F.3d 594

1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1703

Cherie CHARAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., a Missouri corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Mildred Jacoby, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Trans World Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,
and
John Doe, 1-10; Jane Doe, 1-10; Doe Corporations, 1-10;
Doe Partners, 1-10; Doe Entities, 1-10, Defendants.
Bernice Gulley, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
American Airlines; AMR Corporation; American Eagle
Airlines, Defendants-Appellees.
Elizabeth Newman, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
American Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,
and
Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
Robert A. Beverage, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Continental Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 96-15490, 96-15543, 96-15791, 97-15158 and 97-55115.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 23, 1999.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Thelton E. Henderson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-95-00504-TEH.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; Helen Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-94-00963-HG/FIY.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-04044-DLJ.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Napoleon A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-95-02530-NAJ.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-96-03253-DLJ.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, BROWNING, FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, THOMPSON, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T. G. NELSON, KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 160 F.3d 1259

ORDER

1

Appellee American Airlines filed a "Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc" due to a factual error in the Opinion. The Opinion filed in this case on November 30, 1998 is amended at Slip op. page 13310, last three lines through page 13311, line 1 [160 F.3d at 1262], as follows:

2

The last sentence on Slip op. page 13310 [160 F.3d at 1262] and carrying over to the next page should read: "Prior to obtaining the required certificate, Newman was not permitted to board and was required to stay overnight at a motel."

3

With this amendment, the en banc panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing and rejects the suggestion for rehearing en banc.