Francisco v. Francisco, 505 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). · Go Syfert
Francisco v. Francisco, 505 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marie FRANCISCO, Appellant,
v.
Joseph FRANCISCO, Appellee.
86-1710.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 18, 1987.
505 So. 2d 1102
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

[*1103] Denis A. Cohrs of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Patrice A. Pucci of Battaglia, Ross, Hastings, Dicus & Andrews, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in allowing a set off against a judgment for past child support and mortgage payments. For approximately eight years she had received support payments from the Social Security Administration because of appellee's disability. During this period of time she failed to proceed with any court action to enforce the court ordered child support and mortgage payments.

We find that there are compelling, equitable criteria and considerations referred to in Glaeser v. Glaeser, 449 So.2d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), which support a set off in this case.

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.