No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marie HUDSON
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
No. 99-1732.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 5, 2000.
Marie Hudson, in proper person., John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.
Green, Jorgenson, Schwartz.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
PER CURIAM.
As the appeal referee correctly found, the appellant was not eligible for the unemployment compensation benefits sought in this proceeding simply because she had not been employed for a qualifying period under the statute. See § 443.091(2), Fla. Stat. (1999). While she cogently argues that she was improperly denied re-employment because of her age, neither the Unemployment Appeals Commission nor this court has the lawful authority to consider that issue. Hence, we have no choice but to affirm the order under review.