green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Saunders v. KDFBS, LLC
Milne, supra, § 7-17:2, p. 514; see Voluntown v. Rytman, 27 Conn. App. 549, 556 , 607 A.2d 896 (‘‘[a] foreclosure by sale furnishes conflicting claimants an ideal forum for litigating their differences without prejudicing prior encumbrancers’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992); see also Mortgage Electronic Regis- tration Systems, Inc. v. White, supra, 278 Conn. 230 (‘‘[T]he estate that passes by committee deed to a pur- chaser at a foreclosure sale is no more nor less than the estate that had been held by the mortgagor or lien h…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ocwen Federal Bank v. Busby, No. Cv 98 0166790 S (Jan. 26, 2001)
See Voluntown v. Rytman , 27 Conn. App. 549 , 556 . 607 A.2d 896 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992). 8 CT Page 1671 Because the court may order payment to an encumbrancer of record only "to the extend there is no controversy"; id.; the court did not violate the statute by disregarding Cooke's affidavit based on its determination that Cooke had improperly filed its affidavit. 9 Cooke may question the soundness of the court's factual finding or legal conclusion, but there is no evidence to support its claim that the court violated the statute.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martinoli v. Stamford Police Dept.
(2×)
See Mulligan v. F. S. Electric, 231 Conn. 529, 541, 651 A.2d 254 (1994); Rousu v. Collins Co., Martinoli v. Stamford Police Dept. 114 Conn. 24, 31, 157 A. 264 (1931); see also Stevens v. Raymark Corp./Raybestos Manhattan, 28 Conn. App. 226, 228, 610 A.2d 710 (“the relevant date for deter- mining compensation to an injured worker is the date of his incapacity to work . . . where the events leading to a worker’s injury and the incapacity to work do not occur simultaneously” (citation omitted)), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 921, 614 A.2d 830 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citibank, N.A. v. Lindland
Moran v. Momeau, supra, 129 Conn. App. 356 -57; see also Voluntown v. Rytman, 27 Conn. App. 549, 553 , 607 A.2d 896 (noting that, when purchase price exceeded recorded liens, proceeds from sale could pay encumbrancers and foreclosed former owner), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992); D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Somers Mill Assoc. v. Fuss O'neill, No. X03-Cv-00-0503944 (Mar. 7, 2002)
(2×)
LAPLANTE, CONNECTICUT EVIDENCE, (3d.Ed. 2001) § 7.5.4; see also, Sun Hill Industries, Inc. v. Kraftsman Group, Inc ., 27 Conn. App. 688 , 697 , 610 A.2d 684 cert. denied , 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 830 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kroll v. Mazda Motor of America Inc., No. Cv 97-0060070s (Mar. 27, 2000)
Ed. 1988) § 7.16.5; see also Sun Hill Industries, Inc. v. Kraftsman Group, Inc. , 27 Conn. App. 688 , 697 , 610 A.2d 684 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scap Motors v. Pevco Systems Intl., No. Cv97 034 84 61 S (Aug. 12, 1999)
See General Statutes § 42a-2-102 ; see also Sun Hill Industries, Inc. v. Kraftsman Group, Inc. , 27 Conn. App. 688 , 693 , 610 A.2d 684 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992) (where case involves sale of goods, it is governed by Article 2 of the UCC); Roy v. Stephen Pontiac-Cadillac.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Union Bank v. Dixwell Avenue Assoc., No. Cv 97-405814 S (May 1, 1998)
"The decree of foreclosure by sale should not adjudicate the rights of the parties to the funds realized; those rights should be determined by way of supplemental judgment." Gault v. Bacon, 142 Conn. 200 , 203 , 113 A.2d 145 (1955); City National Bank v. Stoeckel, 103 Conn. 732 , 744 , 132 A. 20 (1926); see also Voluntown v. Rytman, 27 Conn. App. 549 , 554-56 , 607 A.2d 896 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 931 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ciarlelli v. Romeo
LaPlante, Connecticut Evidence (2d Ed. 1988) § 7.16.5; see also Sun Hill Industries, Inc. v. Kraftsman Group, Inc., 27 Conn. App. 688, 697 , 610 A.2d 684 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sun Hill Industries, Inc.
v.
Kraftsman Group, Inc.
v.
Kraftsman Group, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 1992.
Scott M. Harrington, in support of the petition.
Published
The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 688, is denied.