green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Polymer Resources, Ltd. v. Keeney
See State v. Ray, 30 Conn. App. 95, 100 , 619 A.2d 469 , cert. granted on other grounds, 225 Conn. 919 , 625 A.2d 822 (1993); but see State Board of Education v. Waterbury, 21 Conn. App. 67 , 74 n.7, 571 A.2d 148 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Appeal from Probate of Girolamo Bencivenga
SC 14743.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 13, 1993.
Cynthia C. Anger, assistant city attorney, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant city of Milford’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 334 (AC 11155), is granted, limited to the following issues:
[*920] Decided April 13, 1993 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14743. Cynthia C. Anger, assistant city attorney, in support of the petition.“1. Where an executrix is removed for cause, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the named successor executors are aggrieved by a Probate Court’s appointment of an administrator, c.t.a.?
“2. Where more than ten years have elapsed since the appointment of an executor, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that General Statutes § 45a-290 (c) requires the appointment of the named successor executors, despite the provisions of General Statutes § 45a-331 which vests the Probate Court with discretion to settle a decedent’s estate?”