State v. Edwards, 666 A.2d 1186 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
State v. Edwards, 666 A.2d 1186 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Grenier (connappct, 1999-11-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Grenier
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Although it is the general rule that a party who induces error cannot be heard to complain about such error; see State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 (1995); unpreserved claims of constitutional magnitude, even when induced by the appellant, may be reviewed pursuant to Golding .
cited Cited "see" Doe v. Bridgeport Hospital
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Guess, 39 Conn. App. 224, 233 , 665 A.2d 126 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Greene
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
The evidence produced at trial established that the crime was, in fact, committed by means of a firearm, but this court has expressly rejected the “evidence-test” and has limited the analysis of whether one offense is a lesser included offense of another to the information, bill of particulars and relevant statutes. 20 See, e.g., State v. Brown, supra, 163 Conn. 60 -63 (trial court properly refused to charge on possession of narcotics, despite evidence of possession, because information merely alleged sale of narcotics); see also State v. Guess, 39 Conn. App. 224, 236-39 , 665 A.2d 126 (ma…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Coleman
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
The separate offense doctrine implicates double jeopardy concerns.” State v. Falcon, supra, 26 Conn. App. 264 ; see also State v. Guess, 39 Conn. App. 224, 238-39 , 665 A.2d 126 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
SHERMAN EDWARDS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 27, 1995.
666 A.2d 1186
Elizabeth M. Inkster, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Harry Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 242 (AC 13223), is denied.