green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Valinski
See Practice Book § 60-5. “[T]his court will reverse a judgment for plain error only in the truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Rodriguez, 49 Conn. App. 606, 612 , 716 A.2d 914 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 925 , 719 A.2d 1171 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Moynahan, Ruskin, Mascolo v. McCarroll, No. Cv96-0133246s (Mar. 6, 2000)
See Friedman v. Millpit Corp., 49 Conn. App. 354 , 358 n. 3, 713 A.2d 1288 (1998), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 925 , 722 A.2d 1216 (1998); 38 Am.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
HARRY RODRIGUEZ
v.
HARRY RODRIGUEZ
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 22, 1998.
Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Susann E. Gill, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 606 (AC 16218), is denied.