Murphy v. Comm'r of Motor Vehs., 738 A.2d 1091 (Conn. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Murphy v. Comm'r of Motor Vehs., 738 A.2d 1091 (Conn. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (conn, 2000-08-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 251 Conn. 904, 905 , 738 A.2d 1091 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MARY ELLEN MURPHY
v.
COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES
SC 16193.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 29, 1999.
738 A.2d 1091
Priscilla J. Green, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition., Barry N. Silver, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 127 (AC 17906), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[*905] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16193. Priscilla J. Green, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Barry N. Silver, in opposition. Decided September 29, 1999
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the evidence in the administrative record was insufficient to establish probable cause that the plaintiff had violated General Statutes § 14-227a?”