green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cator
(2×)
The defendant seeks review of this issue under the doctrine of plain error. 13 “We consistently have stated that review under the plain error doctrine is reserved for truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stephens, 249 Conn. 288, 291 , 734 A.2d 533 (1999); see State v. Niemeyer, 55 Conn. App. 447, 457-58 , 740 A.2d 416 , cert. granted on other grounds, 252 Conn. 916 , 747 A.2d 517 , cert. granted on other grou…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dwyer
(2×)
See Practice Book § 60-5. 13 “[R]eview under the plain error doctrine is reserved for truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Niemeyer, 55 Conn. App. 447, 457-58 , 740 A.2d 416 , cert. granted on other grounds, 252 Conn. 916 , 917, 744 A.2d 437 , 747 A.2d 517 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ham
The trial court sentenced him to a term of imprisonment of fifty years, and, having exhausted his avenues of appeal in this state; see State v. Ham, 55 Conn. App. 281 , 739 A.2d 1268 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 916 , 743 A.2d 1128 (2000) (affirming judgment of conviction); the defendant is currently serving that sentence.
cited
Cited "see"
Ham v. Greene, No. 322775 (Jun. 12, 2000)
See State v. Ham , 55 Conn. App. 281 , 739 A.2d 1268 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 916 , 743 A.2d 1128 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
TONY NIEMEYER
v.
TONY NIEMEYER
SC 16232.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 22, 1999.
Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Pamela S. Nagy, assistant public defender, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 447 (AC 18590), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction for kidnapping in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A) and (C)?”
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.