Strobel v. Strobel, 767 A.2d 103 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Strobel v. Strobel, 767 A.2d 103 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Strobel v. Strobel (connappct, 2001-07-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Strobel v. Strobel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Strobel v. Strobel, 60 Conn. App. 908 , 761 A.2d 803 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 929 , 767 A.2d 103 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Baillargeon v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: compare · confidence low
Although our phrasing of the prejudice prong has not been uniform in previous instances where a party has claimed ineffective assistance on direct appeal; compare, e.g., State v. Gray, 63 Conn. App. 151, 161-62 , 772 A.2d 747 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 934 , 776 A.2d 1151 (2001), with State v. Louise-Julie, 60 Conn. App. 837, 840 , 762 A.2d 913 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 929 , 930, 767 A.2d 102 , 103 (2001); the prejudice prong has always existed in that the appellant has the burden of showing that there is a reasonable probability that but for counsel’s ineffective assistance, the resul…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Benchmark Investments LLC v. Elms at Mystic LLC, No. 555579 (Jan. 11, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Freshnex v. Mount Vernon Strategies, Inc ., Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven at New Haven, Docket No. 437778 (January 19, 2001, Devlin, J .); Norwest Mortgage v. Edwards , Superior Court, judicial district of Ansonia-Milford, Docket No. 057496 (May 4, 1998, Curran, S.T.R .) ( 22 Conn.L.Rptr. 123 , 125); see also Garofalo v. Squillante , 60 Conn. App. 687 , 697-98 n. 4, 760 A.2d 1271 (2000) ( Landau, J ., concurring) ("the defendant may have waived his right to know the statute on which the plaintiffs intended to rely by failing to file a request to revise"), cert. denied, 255 Con…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KEVIN STROBEL
v.
ROSE LI-HWA STROBEL
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 16, 2001.
767 A.2d 103
Kevin Strobel, pro se, in support of the petition., Rose Li-Hwa Strobel, pro se, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 908 (AC 19325), is denied.