Dumont v. UBC, Inc., 782 A.2d 1243 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Dumont v. UBC, Inc., 782 A.2d 1243 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: DiBlase v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc. (connappct, 2010-09-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" DiBlase v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Knoblaugh v. Marshall, 64 Conn. App. 32 , 35 n.3, 779 A.2d 218 (argument that consists of mere bare assertion devoid of any legal authority inadequately briefed), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 916 , 782 A.2d 1243 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Mele v. City of Hartford
Conn. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Knoblaugh v. Marshall, 64 Conn. App. 32, 38-39 , 779 A.2d 218 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 916 , 782 A.2d 1243 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Stanley, (Feb. 19, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
In re Tricia A. , 55 Conn. App. 111 , 114 , 737 A.2d 974 (1999); see also Knoblaugh v. Marshall , 64 Conn. App. 32 , CT Page 1880 39, 779 A.2d 218 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 916 , 782 A.2d 1243 (2001); In re Savanna M. , 55 Conn. App. 807 , 816 , 740 A.2d 484 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DANIEL DUMONT
v.
UBC, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2001.
782 A.2d 1243
Daniel Dumont, pro se, in support of the petition., A. Jeffrey Somers, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 903 (AC 20912), is denied.

A. Jeffrey Somers, in opposition. Decided September 20, 2001