green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael G. v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Moore, 65 Conn. App. 717, 728 , 783 A.2d 1100 (declining review where no plain error claim was made), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 940 , 786 A.2d 427 (2001); see also State v. James R., supra, 202 (same).2 In this case, the petitioner does not argue that plain error exists and, therefore, we decline to review his claim.3 In sum, the petitioner has not proven that the issues in the underlying claim are debatable among jurists of reason, that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner, or that the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kendall
(2×)
See State v. Rizzo, supra, 266 Conn. 261 . “[I]t is improper for a prosecutor to express his or her opinion, directly or indirectly, as to a defendant’s guilt.” State v. Moore, 65 Conn. App. 717, 724 , 783 A.2d 1100 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 940 , 786 A.2d 427 (2001). 5 The transcript 6 does not demonstrate necessarily that the prosecutor’s use of the phrase “you claim” and repetitions of the defendant’s answers were sarcastic.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Verdolini
See State v. Moore, 65 Conn. App. 717, 721 , 783 A.2d 1100 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 940 , 786 A.2d 427 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
GEORGE MOORE
v.
GEORGE MOORE
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 14, 2001.
Martin Zeldis, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 717 (AC 20037), is denied.
Martin Zeldis, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 14, 2001