green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Abdulaziz
See State v. Guadalupe, 66 Conn. App. 819, 827 , 786 A.2d 494 (2001) (‘‘[w]hen interpreting statutes, we afford statutory language its plain and ordinary meaning and refrain from reading into statutes provisions that are not clearly stated’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 907 , 789 A.2d 996 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tok
See State v. Aponte, 66 Conn. App. 429, 455 , 784 A.2d 991 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 907 , 789 A.2d 995 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ashe
Accordingly, the defendant’s claims of evidentiary insufficiency are without merit.” (Citation omitted; emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 544 ; see also State v. Orta, 66 Conn. App. 783, 790-91 , 786 A.2d 504 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 907 , 789 A.2d 997 (2002); State v. Bond, 49 Conn. App. 183, 197-98 , 713 A.2d 906 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 915 , 722 A.2d 808 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
NICHOLAS APONTE
v.
NICHOLAS APONTE
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 3, 2002.
Neal Cone, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Nancy L. Chupak, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 429 (AC 20233), is denied.