green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Field v. Hartford
See State v. Denson, 67 Conn. App. 803, 811 (2002) (“[W]e must presume that when the legislature uses different language, the legislature intends a different meaning of one statute from the other.”), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 915 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Nelson
See State v. Denson, 67 Conn. App. 803, 810-12 , 789 A.2d 1075 (holding that § 53a-59 [a] [1] does not include permanency requirement), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 915 , 797 A.2d 514 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jenkins
See State v. Denson, 67 Conn. App. 803, 815 , 789 A.2d 1075 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 915 , 797 A.2d 514 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morgan
See State v. Denson, 67 Conn. App. 803, 815 , 789 A.2d 1075 (failure to object to allegedly improper argument often indicates that counsel did not “ ‘view the remarks as so prejudicial that his client’s right to a fair trial was seriously jeopardized’ ”), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 915 , 797 A.2d 514 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Miranda
That presumption is rebutted only by a clear indication of a contrary legislative intent.” [Citation omitted.]); see also State v. Denson, 67 Conn. App. 803, 810-11 , 789 A.2d 1075 (no double jeopardy violation where defendant was convicted of two counts of first degree assault, one under General Statutes § 53a-59 [a] [1] and the other under § 53a-59 [a] [2], arising out of same act), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 915 , 797 A.2d 514 (2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Porter
Ed. 2d 1062 (1991); see also State v. Denson, 67 Conn. App. 803, 807-808 , 789 A.2d 1075 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 915 , 797 A.2d 514 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MICHAEL DIBELLO
v.
BARNES PAGE WIRE PRODUCTS, INC.
v.
BARNES PAGE WIRE PRODUCTS, INC.
SC 16720.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 12, 2002.
Leo Gold, in support of the petition., Michael J. McAuliffe, in opposition.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 67 Conn. App. 361 (AC 20612), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the decision of the compensation review board affirming the finding of the worker’s compensation commissioner that the notice by Aetna Casualty and Surety Company to its insured was one of nonrenewal and, therefore, compliance with the cancellation notice requirements of General Statutes § 31-348 was not necessary?”