Holloway v. Comm'r of Corr., 808 A.2d 1136 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Holloway v. Comm'r of Corr., 808 A.2d 1136 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Haywood (connappct, 2008-08-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Haywood
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ortiz, 71 Conn. App. 865, 879 , 804 A.2d 937 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 942 , 808 A.2d 1136 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Fleming v. City of Bridgeport
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Karantonis v. East Hartford, 71 Conn. App. 859, 861 , 804 A.2d 861 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 944 , 808 A.2d 1137 (2002). 6 The plaintiff also requested attorney’s fees.
discussed Cited "see" Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National Bank
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Karatonis v. East Hartford, 71 Conn. App. 859, 860 , 804 A.2d 861 (judgment affirmed on alternate ground without addressing issues raised on appeal), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 944 , 808 A.2d 1137 (2002); see also Lunn v. Cummings & Lockwood, 56 Conn. App. 363, 369 , 743 A.2d 653 (2000).
cited Cited "see" State v. Hightower
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., 868 .
discussed Cited "see" Lemoine v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
Furthermore, “[w]e have [also] adopted the two-part Strickland analysis in the context of a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Crump v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 68 Conn. App. 337 ; see Holloway v. Commissioner of Correction, 72 Conn. App. 244, 249 , 804 A.2d 995 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 944 , 808 A.2d 1136 (2002).
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Sanseverino (4×)
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Ortiz, 71 Conn. App. 865, 879 , 804 A.2d 937 (modifying conviction of robbery in first degree to reflect lesser included offense of robbery in second degree, even though trial court had not instructed jury on lesser included offense), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 942 , 808 A.2d 1136 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ray (2×)
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Accord State v. Coston, supra, 182 Conn. 437 (reversing for insufficient evidence conviction for attempted robbery in first degree and remanding with direction to modify judgment to reflect conviction of lesser included offense of attempted larceny in fourth degree); see also State v. Ortiz, 71 Conn. App. 865, 878 , 804 A.2d 937 (“even in the absence of a request at trial for a jury instruction on a lesser included offense, an appellate court may invoke the [doctrine enunciated in State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 , 427 A.2d 414 (1980)] 6 where the trial court record justifies its appli…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ANTHONY HOLLOWAY
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 9, 2002.
808 A.2d 1136
Raymond J. Rigat, special public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisor assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The petitioner Anthony Holloway’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 72 Conn. App. 244 (AC 22029), is denied.

NORCOTT and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisor assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 9, 2002